The Georgia Bulldogs are your 2021 college football national champions after ending a 41 year drought with a 4th quarter rally to down fellow SEC member and defending national champion, Alabama in the title game.
Georgia finished number one in both our power rating and strength of record rating as well as number one in almost all of the computer polls out there.
The Book had Alabama second, followed by Michigan, Ohio State, Oklahoma State, Notre Dame, Cincinnati, Baylor, Oklahoma and Utah rounding out the top 10.
The Book sat on the winning side against both the spread and the money line, picking the Dawgs to win by 4.8 points and although we wound up finishing with the worst record we've ever had against the Vegas line, feeling pretty good in general about strides that were made in progressing our model.
Using our new selection criteria, we showed a profit of 9.5 units on the season against the spread for a modest 23.17% ROI while against the money line, we were 42.61 to the good, for a 72.22% ROI, overall netting 52.11 units for a 52.11% ROI.
Over and Under Achievers
At season's inception, we had Boston College finishing 2nd in the ACC Atlantic with an 8-4 record, 4-4 in conference. Clearly, that didn't pan out and the Eagles have to go on the overall list of underachievers for 2021.
Boston College finished 87th in the nation, 4.02 points below their opening power rating. The Eagles also had no wins over any team considered an overachiever (i.e. points above their opening power rating). By those measurements, BC's best win was at Georgia Tech, also an underachiever (-4.82).
In terms of the national picture, interesting that Georgia was one of the largest overachievers of the season, while Alabama was just slightly below their preseason projection.
Below you will see our list of top over and under achievers. Delta is the power rating points change from the preseason poll. Rank delta is the change in overall rank (1-130) from the preseason poll.
Overachievers | Delta | Rank Delta |
|
1 | WESTERN KENTUCKY | 17.76 | 64 |
2 | UTAH STATE | 15.29 | 80 |
3 | MICHIGAN | 14.39 | 25 |
4 | GEORGIA | 13.86 | 4 |
5 | OLD DOMINION | 13.77 | 28 |
6 | BAYLOR | 12.26 | 35 |
7 | MICHIGAN ST | 10.99 | 54 |
8 | UTEP | 9.42 | 28 |
9 | ARKANSAS | 8.87 | 22 |
10 | PITTSBURGH | 8.73 | 25 |
Underachievers | Delta | Rank Delta |
|
130 | INDIANA | (18.11) | (73) |
129 | FLORIDA INTL | (17.60) | (10) |
128 | TCU | (14.61) | (54) |
127 | TEMPLE | (13.87) | (14) |
126 | USC | (12.86) | (64) |
125 | FLORIDA | (12.33) | (58) |
124 | DUKE | (12.26) | (22) |
123 | WASHINGTON | (12.21) | (66) |
122 | NORTHWESTERN | (12.19) | (59) |
121 | BUFFALO | (12.09) | (37) |
Noteables | Delta | Rank Delta |
|
3 | MICHIGAN | 14.39 | 25 |
35 | CINCINNATI | 5.15 | 15 |
70 | ALABAMA | (1.26) | (1) |
87 | BOSTON COLLEGE | (4.02) | (27) |
Strength of Schedule
Below you'll find our final strength of schedule rankings. These are based on the average of the power ratings of the opponents played. Of course, Georgia, Alabama and Michigan all benefitted from playing extra games in the CFP to bolster that final rating, while the bottom 10 teams are all group of five teams.
Boston College who was low on this list prior to the end of the year, only got worse, finishing with the worst strength of schedule of any P5 team at #102.
Top SOS | |
1 | INDIANA |
2 | ALABAMA |
3 | OKLAHOMA ST |
4 | LSU |
5 | NEBRASKA |
6 | GEORGIA |
7 | STANFORD |
8 | TEXAS |
9 | MICHIGAN |
10 | MICHIGAN ST |
Bottom SOS | |
130 | COASTAL CAROLINA |
129 | UTEP |
128 | CHARLOTTE |
127 | TOLEDO |
126 | SOUTHERN MIS |
125 | BUFFALO |
124 | SOUTH ALABAMA |
123 | NORTH TEXAS |
122 | OHIO |
121 | OLD DOMINION |
Bottom P5 SOS | |
102 | BOSTON COLLEGE |
93 | TEXAS A&M |
91 | WAKE FOREST |
90 | ARIZONA ST |
77 | NORTH CAROLINA |
76 | MIAMI FL |
73 | TENNESSEE |
71 | COLORADO |
68 | MARYLAND |
65 | SOUTH CAROLINA |
Plans for 2022
Every year, I try to come up with ways to add to or improve on the model presented here. This year's major add was the selection metrics to pick against the Vegas spread, which showed that even in a bad year overall, you can have success if selective.
For 2022, as I've been looking to do now for ages, I do plan on creating my own (not an aggregate) power ranking to be used and this gets us into a Boston College forecast for next year. This is a way, way, way too early look, but the general formula is pretty simple. Talent, recruiting, program history, returning production, added production, put them together and you can get a fairly decent idea of what any team will be projected to do.
Boston College is up on both the talent and recruiting front. The past two years of recruiting will raise both those metrics, albeit the talent is still mostly on the young end. Program history will be slightly down, BC did not live up to expectations in 2021 and hasn't been much more than mediocre over the four or five year window we will look at. Returning production is where the issue lies, mostly in terms of the offensive line, where we saw the drop off with Tyler Vrabel's injury and of course losing three experienced starters as well as what is being lost in the defensive secondary. The Eagles will most likely be favored against Maine, Connecticut, Syracuse and Duke and underdogs against Clemson, Notre Dame, NC State, Florida State and Wake Forest. Games that will probably sit in the toss up category will be Rutgers, Louisville and Virginia Tech. This leads me to believe that even in year three of the Jeff Hafley era, BC is still in that 6-6, 7-5 range for a predicted outcome.
See you in 2022 and Go Eagles!
RANK | TEAM | WON | LOST | POWER | SOR | SAGARIN | MASSEY | ESPN FPI |
AP | COACHES | CHANGE FROM PRE SEASON |
CHANGE FROM LAST WK |
1 | GEORGIA | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
2 | ALABAMA | 13 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | (1) | 0 |
3 | MICHIGAN | 12 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 0 |
4 | OHIO ST | 11 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
5 | OKLAHOMA ST | 12 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 16 | 2 |
6 | NOTRE DAME | 11 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 12 | (1) |
7 | CINCINNATI | 13 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 15 | (1) |
8 | BAYLOR | 12 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 35 | 0 |
9 | OKLAHOMA | 11 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 10 | (7) | 0 |
10 | UTAH | 10 | 4 | 7 | 19 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 1 |
11 | MICHIGAN ST | 11 | 2 | 22 | 8 | 19 | 10 | 19 | 9 | 8 | 54 | 2 |
12 | CLEMSON | 10 | 3 | 9 | 20 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 14 | 16 | (9) | 3 |
13 | MISSISSIPPI | 10 | 3 | 20 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 18 | 11 | 11 | 11 | (1) |
14 | PITTSBURGH | 11 | 3 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 25 | (4) |
15 | WISCONSIN | 9 | 4 | 14 | 23 | 12 | 13 | 13 | (7) | 1 | ||
16 | LOUISIANA | 13 | 1 | 37 | 11 | 37 | 23 | 48 | 16 | 18 | 25 | 2 |
17 | WAKE FOREST | 11 | 3 | 28 | 17 | 21 | 17 | 22 | 15 | 14 | 38 | 4 |
18 | IOWA | 10 | 4 | 31 | 13 | 25 | 20 | 32 | 23 | 23 | (2) | (4) |
19 | PURDUE | 9 | 4 | 23 | 22 | 23 | 18 | 25 | 39 | 4 | ||
20 | HOUSTON | 12 | 2 | 32 | 15 | 34 | 21 | 37 | 17 | 17 | 48 | 8 |
21 | NORTH CAROLINA ST | 9 | 3 | 16 | 28 | 17 | 22 | 16 | 20 | 19 | 13 | (4) |
22 | ARKANSAS | 9 | 4 | 17 | 29 | 24 | 16 | 21 | 21 | 20 | 22 | 9 |
23 | KENTUCKY | 10 | 3 | 25 | 25 | 20 | 19 | 28 | 18 | 15 | 15 | 2 |
24 | MINNESOTA | 9 | 4 | 19 | 27 | 22 | 25 | 27 | 5 | 3 | ||
25 | OREGON | 10 | 4 | 38 | 18 | 26 | 30 | 30 | 22 | 21 | (13) | (6) |
26 | TEXAS A&M | 8 | 4 | 13 | 36 | 15 | 24 | 14 | 25 | (20) | (4) | |
27 | IOWA ST | 7 | 6 | 12 | 39 | 14 | 26 | 9 | (20) | (3) | ||
28 | BYU | 10 | 3 | 43 | 24 | 33 | 28 | 40 | 19 | 22 | 22 | (8) |
29 | UCLA | 8 | 4 | 18 | 35 | 29 | 35 | 31 | 6 | (3) | ||
30 | KANSAS ST | 8 | 5 | 26 | 32 | 27 | 31 | 35 | 27 | 7 | ||
31 | SAN DIEGO ST | 12 | 2 | 64 | 14 | 52 | 29 | 72 | 25 | 47 | 4 | |
32 | PENN ST | 7 | 6 | 21 | 41 | 18 | 27 | 17 | (22) | (2) | ||
33 | APPALACHIAN ST | 10 | 4 | 42 | 30 | 46 | 37 | 33 | 3 | (4) | ||
34 | UTAH ST | 11 | 3 | 58 | 26 | 54 | 36 | 74 | 24 | 24 | 80 | 8 |
35 | UTSA | 12 | 2 | 76 | 21 | 61 | 34 | 57 | 59 | (3) | ||
36 | MIAMI FL | 7 | 5 | 24 | 48 | 38 | 41 | 23 | (21) | (2) | ||
37 | AIR FORCE | 10 | 3 | 48 | 33 | 39 | 32 | 66 | 48 | 9 | ||
38 | ARIZONA ST | 8 | 5 | 33 | 40 | 36 | 50 | 39 | (13) | (2) | ||
39 | COASTAL CAROLINA | 11 | 2 | 56 | 31 | 56 | 44 | 45 | 6 | 4 | ||
40 | TENNESSEE | 7 | 6 | 27 | 59 | 32 | 39 | 26 | 13 | (2) | ||
41 | TEXAS TECH | 7 | 6 | 41 | 43 | 41 | 45 | 50 | 15 | 14 | ||
42 | FRESNO ST | 10 | 3 | 59 | 34 | 50 | 38 | 53 | 45 | 2 | ||
43 | MISSISSIPPI ST | 7 | 6 | 36 | 46 | 40 | 43 | 36 | (10) | (10) | ||
44 | WESTERN KENTUCKY | 9 | 5 | 34 | 49 | 45 | 42 | 41 | 64 | 10 | ||
45 | AUBURN | 6 | 7 | 29 | 61 | 30 | 40 | 20 | (25) | (6) | ||
46 | WASHINGTON ST | 7 | 6 | 39 | 53 | 44 | 60 | 54 | 13 | (6) | ||
47 | UCF | 9 | 4 | 63 | 38 | 53 | 52 | 55 | (15) | 13 | ||
48 | UAB | 9 | 4 | 55 | 42 | 65 | 51 | 60 | 26 | 9 | ||
49 | CENTRAL MICHIGAN | 9 | 4 | 51 | 44 | 67 | 62 | 79 | 37 | 9 | ||
50 | LSU | 6 | 7 | 44 | 56 | 35 | 49 | 42 | (37) | (9) | ||
51 | SMU | 8 | 4 | 53 | 47 | 49 | 48 | 44 | 13 | (2) | ||
52 | BOISE ST | 7 | 5 | 46 | 54 | 28 | 33 | 38 | (3) | (2) | ||
53 | OREGON ST | 7 | 6 | 49 | 55 | 43 | 59 | 52 | 20 | (8) | ||
54 | LOUISVILLE | 6 | 7 | 40 | 65 | 51 | 56 | 46 | (2) | (7) | ||
55 | TEXAS | 5 | 7 | 35 | 67 | 31 | 47 | 24 | (44) | (3) | ||
56 | GEORGIA ST | 8 | 5 | 57 | 52 | 82 | 69 | 83 | 32 | 8 | ||
57 | ARMY | 9 | 4 | 85 | 37 | 66 | 46 | 61 | 38 | 5 | ||
58 | NORTH CAROLINA | 6 | 7 | 45 | 69 | 55 | 65 | 43 | (44) | (10) | ||
59 | WEST VIRGINIA | 6 | 7 | 50 | 66 | 48 | 54 | 49 | (29) | (3) | ||
60 | MARYLAND | 7 | 6 | 71 | 51 | 57 | 53 | 63 | 1 | 12 | ||
61 | TULSA | 7 | 6 | 62 | 60 | 74 | 68 | 76 | 8 | 5 | ||
62 | NEVADA | 8 | 5 | 67 | 58 | 60 | 55 | 59 | 9 | (11) | ||
63 | SOUTH CAROLINA | 7 | 6 | 74 | 50 | 58 | 57 | 69 | 12 | 11 | ||
64 | VIRGINIA | 6 | 6 | 60 | 63 | 63 | 63 | 47 | (17) | (5) | ||
65 | WESTERN MICHIGAN | 8 | 5 | 75 | 57 | 69 | 64 | 75 | 12 | 11 | ||
66 | FLORIDA ST | 5 | 7 | 47 | 75 | 62 | 71 | 51 | (15) | (3) | ||
67 | FLORIDA | 6 | 7 | 52 | 70 | 42 | 61 | 34 | (58) | (14) | ||
68 | LIBERTY | 8 | 5 | 68 | 62 | 59 | 58 | 56 | 2 | 10 | ||
69 | EAST CAROLINA | 7 | 5 | 73 | 64 | 78 | 67 | 81 | 28 | (4) | ||
70 | ILLINOIS | 5 | 7 | 61 | 74 | 72 | 70 | 67 | 19 | (3) | ||
71 | VIRGINIA TECH | 6 | 7 | 65 | 71 | 76 | 76 | 64 | (40) | (10) | ||
72 | NORTHERN ILLINOIS | 9 | 5 | 90 | 45 | 88 | 74 | 93 | 35 | (4) | ||
73 | NEBRASKA | 3 | 9 | 30 | 97 | 47 | 66 | 29 | (36) | 2 | ||
74 | CALIFORNIA | 5 | 7 | 54 | 86 | 64 | 83 | 73 | (14) | (3) | ||
75 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 6 | 6 | 72 | 76 | 75 | 78 | 71 | (27) | (2) | ||
76 | MISSOURI | 6 | 7 | 81 | 68 | 73 | 73 | 78 | (34) | (7) | ||
77 | TCU | 5 | 7 | 83 | 72 | 68 | 72 | 68 | (54) | 3 | ||
78 | TOLEDO | 7 | 6 | 70 | 85 | 77 | 81 | 65 | (12) | (8) | ||
79 | MARSHALL | 7 | 6 | 80 | 77 | 80 | 75 | 70 | 5 | (2) | ||
80 | MEMPHIS | 6 | 6 | 82 | 78 | 81 | 77 | 80 | (26) | (1) | ||
81 | USC | 4 | 8 | 66 | 89 | 70 | 86 | 58 | (64) | 0 | ||
82 | SYRACUSE | 5 | 7 | 78 | 82 | 79 | 81 | 77 | 18 | 0 | ||
83 | MIAMI OH | 7 | 6 | 77 | 83 | 84 | 80 | 85 | 18 | 3 | ||
84 | WYOMING | 7 | 6 | 87 | 73 | 83 | 79 | 88 | (5) | 4 | ||
85 | WASHINGTON | 4 | 8 | 69 | 92 | 71 | 88 | 62 | (66) | (2) | ||
86 | MIDDLE TENNESSEE | 7 | 6 | 89 | 81 | 92 | 87 | 87 | 26 | 5 | ||
87 | COLORADO | 4 | 8 | 79 | 91 | 87 | 96 | 89 | (24) | (3) | ||
88 | RUTGERS | 5 | 8 | 94 | 84 | 85 | 84 | 86 | (7) | (3) | ||
89 | NAVY | 4 | 8 | 88 | 93 | 91 | 85 | 101 | 17 | 7 | ||
90 | KENT ST | 7 | 7 | 101 | 79 | 99 | 91 | 100 | 8 | (1) | ||
91 | EASTERN MICHIGAN | 7 | 6 | 102 | 80 | 98 | 90 | 95 | 1 | (4) | ||
92 | GEORGIA TECH | 3 | 9 | 86 | 101 | 90 | 94 | 82 | (25) | 1 | ||
93 | STANFORD | 3 | 9 | 91 | 95 | 86 | 99 | 91 | (47) | 2 | ||
94 | HAWAII | 6 | 7 | 99 | 90 | 94 | 89 | 102 | 5 | 0 | ||
95 | BALL ST | 6 | 7 | 100 | 88 | 95 | 92 | 103 | (23) | (5) | ||
96 | NORTH TEXAS | 6 | 7 | 95 | 96 | 102 | 95 | 96 | 19 | (4) | ||
97 | UTEP | 7 | 6 | 105 | 87 | 108 | 93 | 110 | 28 | 1 | ||
98 | OLD DOMINION | 6 | 7 | 98 | 94 | 103 | 98 | 105 | 28 | (1) | ||
99 | NORTHWESTERN | 3 | 9 | 92 | 103 | 93 | 102 | 94 | (59) | 0 | ||
100 | INDIANA | 2 | 10 | 93 | 106 | 89 | 97 | 84 | (73) | 0 | ||
101 | TROY | 5 | 7 | 106 | 99 | 105 | 103 | 98 | (21) | 0 | ||
102 | TULANE | 2 | 10 | 84 | 119 | 96 | 104 | 90 | (40) | 0 | ||
103 | FLORIDA ATLANTIC | 5 | 7 | 107 | 98 | 101 | 101 | 92 | (13) | 0 | ||
104 | SAN JOSE ST | 5 | 7 | 109 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 108 | (22) | 0 | ||
105 | SOUTH ALABAMA | 5 | 7 | 110 | 102 | 111 | 106 | 109 | 16 | 0 | ||
106 | LA MONROE | 4 | 8 | 115 | 104 | 119 | 107 | 120 | 18 | 0 | ||
107 | COLORADO ST | 3 | 9 | 104 | 112 | 97 | 105 | 97 | (5) | 0 | ||
108 | KANSAS | 2 | 10 | 112 | 109 | 113 | 108 | 114 | 5 | 1 | ||
109 | SOUTH FLORIDA | 2 | 10 | 97 | 117 | 109 | 110 | 107 | (5) | (1) | ||
110 | GEORGIA SOUTHERN | 3 | 9 | 103 | 114 | 114 | 116 | 111 | (19) | 0 | ||
111 | ARIZONA | 1 | 11 | 96 | 123 | 104 | 118 | 106 | (18) | 0 | ||
112 | TEXAS ST | 4 | 8 | 116 | 108 | 123 | 115 | 119 | 8 | 0 | ||
113 | BUFFALO | 4 | 8 | 113 | 113 | 107 | 112 | 99 | (37) | 1 | ||
114 | VANDERBILT | 2 | 10 | 111 | 116 | 116 | 120 | 121 | (9) | (1) | ||
115 | CHARLOTTE | 5 | 7 | 122 | 105 | 118 | 113 | 117 | 3 | 0 | ||
116 | RICE | 4 | 8 | 121 | 107 | 120 | 111 | 122 | 0 | 1 | ||
117 | OHIO | 3 | 9 | 108 | 122 | 110 | 121 | 115 | (34) | 2 | ||
118 | DUKE | 3 | 9 | 120 | 111 | 115 | 119 | 113 | (22) | (2) | ||
119 | LOUISIANA TECH | 3 | 9 | 117 | 115 | 112 | 114 | 104 | (9) | (1) | ||
120 | UNLV | 2 | 10 | 114 | 121 | 106 | 109 | 112 | 2 | 0 | ||
121 | BOWLING GREEN | 4 | 8 | 123 | 110 | 122 | 117 | 123 | 6 | 0 | ||
122 | ARKANSAS ST | 2 | 10 | 118 | 125 | 117 | 125 | 118 | (19) | 0 | ||
123 | SOUTHERN MISS | 3 | 9 | 119 | 124 | 124 | 123 | 116 | (14) | 0 | ||
124 | NEW MEXICO | 3 | 9 | 124 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 124 | (7) | 0 | ||
125 | TEMPLE | 3 | 9 | 126 | 118 | 125 | 124 | 125 | (14) | 0 | ||
126 | NEW MEXICO ST | 2 | 10 | 127 | 126 | 127 | 126 | 127 | 4 | 1 | ||
127 | AKRON | 2 | 10 | 125 | 127 | 126 | 127 | 128 | (4) | (1) | ||
128 | CONNECTICUT | 1 | 11 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 129 | 0 | 0 | ||
129 | FLORIDA INTL | 1 | 11 | 129 | 130 | 129 | 129 | 126 | (10) | 0 | ||
130 | MASSACHUSETTS | 1 | 11 | 130 | 129 | 130 | 130 | 130 | (1) | 0 | ||
ACC | TEAM | WON | LOST | POWER | SOR | SAGARIN | MASSEY | ESPN FPI |
AP | COACHES | CHANGE FROM PRE SEASON |
CHANGE FROM LAST WK |
1 | CLEMSON | 10 | 3 | 9 | 20 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 14 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
2 | PITTSBURGH | 11 | 3 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 4 | 0 |
3 | WAKE FOREST | 11 | 3 | 28 | 17 | 21 | 17 | 22 | 15 | 14 | 8 | 0 |
4 | NORTH CAROLINA ST | 9 | 3 | 16 | 28 | 17 | 22 | 16 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 |
5 | MIAMI FL | 7 | 5 | 24 | 48 | 38 | 41 | 23 | 0 | (2) | 0 | |
6 | LOUISVILLE | 6 | 7 | 40 | 65 | 51 | 56 | 46 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
7 | NORTH CAROLINA | 6 | 7 | 45 | 69 | 55 | 65 | 43 | 0 | (5) | 0 | |
8 | VIRGINIA | 6 | 6 | 60 | 63 | 63 | 63 | 47 | 0 | (1) | 0 | |
9 | FLORIDA ST | 5 | 7 | 47 | 75 | 62 | 71 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
10 | VIRGINIA TECH | 6 | 7 | 65 | 71 | 76 | 76 | 64 | 0 | (6) | (1) | |
11 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 6 | 6 | 72 | 76 | 75 | 78 | 71 | 0 | (3) | 0 | |
12 | SYRACUSE | 5 | 7 | 78 | 82 | 79 | 81 | 77 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
13 | GEORGIA TECH | 3 | 9 | 86 | 101 | 90 | 94 | 82 | 0 | (1) | 0 | |
14 | DUKE | 3 | 9 | 120 | 111 | 115 | 119 | 113 | 0 | (1) | 0 |
Vs The Vegas Spread | Won | Lost | Pct. |
Week | 1 | 0 | 1.000 |
Previous | 349 | 400 | 0.466 |
Total | 350 | 400 | 0.46667 |
Straight Up | Won | Lost | Pct |
Week | 1 | 0 | 1.000 |
Previous | 528 | 240 | 0.688 |
Total | 529 | 240 | 0.68791 |
Absolute Error | Avg | Games | |
Week | 10.2000 | 1 | |
Previous | 13.2193 | 713 | |
Total | 13.2151 | 714 | |
Prediction Tracker | Rank | # of Polls | |
Straight Up | 44 | 54 | |
vs Spread | 45 | 54 | |
Absolute Error | 20 | 54 |
Money Line Picks | Units | ||
Week | 0.00 | ||
Previous | 42.61 | ||
Total | 42.61 | ||
Spread Picks | Units | ||
Week | 0.00 | ||
Previous | 9.50 | ||
Total | 9.50 | ||
Spread By Week | Profit | Win | Loss |
Week 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
Week 1 | 2.00 | 2 | 0 |
Week 2 | 1.00 | 1 | 0 |
Week 3 | 2.00 | 2 | 0 |
Week 4 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
Week 5 | 1.00 | 1 | 0 |
Week 6 | (1.10) | 0 | 1 |
Week 7 | 1.00 | 1 | 0 |
Week 8 | 2.00 | 2 | 0 |
Week 9 | (2.20) | 0 | 2 |
Week 10 | 0.90 | 2 | 1 |
Week 11 | 0.80 | 3 | 2 |
Week 12 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
Week 13 | 3.70 | 7 | 3 |
Week 14 | (0.10) | 1 | 1 |
Week 15 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
Bowls | (1.50) | 4 | 5 |
CFP | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 9.50 | 26 | 15 |
Money Line by Week | Profit | Win | Loss |
Week 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
Week 1 | 3.00 | 1 | 4 |
Week 2 | 8.75 | 2 | 3 |
Week 3 | (2.00) | 1 | 7 |
Week 4 | 0.10 | 1 | 3 |
Week 5 | 6.60 | 3 | 3 |
Week 6 | 11.75 | 3 | 4 |
Week 7 | 2.00 | 1 | 2 |
Week 8 | 1.25 | 1 | 3 |
Week 9 | 2.40 | 1 | 1 |
Week 10 | 7.74 | 3 | 2 |
Week 11 | (1.00) | 0 | 1 |
Week 12 | 2.50 | 1 | 3 |
Week 13 | 0.52 | 1 | 3 |
Week 14 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
Week 15 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
Bowls | (1.00) | 0 | 1 |
CFP | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 42.61 | 19 | 40 |