Boston College Knocks Off Clemson, Notches First ACC Win, 59-57
After losing to all four programs from Massachusetts -- Holy Cross (86-64), UMass (82-46), Boston University (75-61) and Harvard (67-46) -- as well as the two schools from Rhode Island, a point that the announcers brought up ad nauseum last night, Steve Donahue and his young Eagles squad were looking for any sort of positive going into Thursday night's ACC contest with the Clemson Tigers.
The Eagles received some much needed validation in the form a 59-57 upset victory over Clemson. And at least for a night, Donahue and BC earned some respect in the ACC.
"For us to come out and really compete and get a win, obviously the rest of the league says, ‘You know what, they are playing.' There is some respect there," Donahue continued. "Not that it means a whole lot but you want that. You want people to understand you have a good basketball team with good players that play hard."
BC was led by center Dennis Clifford, who scored 15 points on 5-8 shooting, grabbed seven boards and looked more comfortable handling the ball down low. Lonnie Jackson was the only other Eagle to score in double figures, finishing with 14 points and 4 assists.
Credit to the team for playing hard and putting together their most complete game of the season. Early in the second half, when Clemson pushed their lead to 39-32, it appeared as if BC was going to let another game slip away in the second half. But BC battled back, going on a 16-4 run over the next 5:32 to take a 48-43 lead with 10:29 left.
The game's final minutes were full of drama that could have been avoided had the Eagles hit some critical free throws down the stretch.
Clifford put the Eagles up two with 2:56 to play, dunking the ball after posting up and taking a great feed from Lonnie Jackson. BC and Clemson traded the next four possessions without scoring any points. Clemson's Tanner Smith then got John Cahill to commit the foul on a three-point attempt, and Tanner hit 2-of-3 FTs to knot the game at 56.
With the game tied at 56-56, Clifford took a pass from Jackson on a pick-and-roll give-and-go and was able to score what ended up being the game-winning points. On the following possession, Tanner Smith turned the ball over with a travel.
After being intentionally fouled, Clifford missed both free throws. BC then committed a foul on Milton Jennings, whose first free throw was too strong and clanked off the rim. On the Eagles final possession, Lonnie Jackson's first free throw rimmed out with 8.7 seconds remaining. Jackson sunk the second to push BC's lead to 2.
With 5.0 seconds left, Clemson inbounded the ball to Jennings who attempt rattled in and out. BC had seemingly won the game until the refs called a foul on Dennis Clifford with 1.0 seconds left -- a highly questionable call on Booker's put back attempt. Booker's first free throw rimmed out and on the second, the intentional miss was good but Clemson committed a lane violation, turning the ball over and helping BC preserve a one point victory.
You have to be happy for the players who were extremely pumped to notch their first ACC win. Hopefully the team can build on this victory and we'll see BC notch a few more wins in conference play this season.
A few other observations.
Clifford down low. Clifford had his best game of the season and has come a long way in a very short time. Hopefully he can turn into the big that this team needs him to be and he uses this game as a springboard for more strong performances in ACC play.
Free throws. BC really left the door open for Clemson down the stretch, missing some critical free throws. I know this team is young, but they really have got to improve on their shooting from the charity stripe. The Eagles were just 11-20 from the line, which was only their fifth worst FT shooting performance on the year (and are coming off a 3-9 performance at North Carolina).
Threes. The team shot well from beyond the arc, particularly Jordan Daniels who finished 3-5 from range. Lonnie Jackson had some big threes (2-5) and Matt Humphrey connected a pair (2-4) as well.
Turnovers. This will come with experience (I hope), but BC is still managing an extremely high number of turnovers per game. The Eagles had 16 yesterday and Humphrey accounted for four of those TOs. BC has now committed 13 or more turnovers in five straight games, going back to the win over Bryant.
Attendance. Conte Forum was a mausoleum last night. Yesterday's listed attendance of 3,829 was just the sixth best attended home game (of 10 this season), and only topped the season opener against New Hampshire (3,588), Bryant (3,563), Stony Brook (3,426) and Sacred Heart (2,263) games. I know this team is young, has racked up a ton of early season losses and that students are on winter break. But when you get back to campus, consider going to a game and supporting the team. It's clear the team is still playing hard and can use your support. Crazy to think that there's just seven home games remaining this season, so make those home games against non-Duke opponents count.
It's a quick turnaround for the Eagles (6-10, 1-1 ACC) as they host Virginia Tech on Saturday afternoon at Conte Forum. Game tips at 3 PM.
Go Eagles!
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The game's final minutes were full of drama that could have been avoided had the Eagles hit some critical free throws down the stretch.
Clemson fans can say the same thing. Ugly end all around. Still, I was worried about BC pulling it out when it was tight down the stretch. Good to see them keep their heads until the final second. Nice win!
When I can
buy a $10 ticket for the upper deck, and then walk into the front row in a center section, and sit down and watch the game, just like I’ve done for every single home game this year, without ever having a problem, then something really needs to be done about attendance.
I remember as a student BC’s first year in the ACC. Because of their success the year before you couldnt get a student season ticket. Which pissed me off, as I had religiously gone to all the games the year before but all the bandwagoners snagged up all the season tickets and I had to wait. Honestly at this point I would take that situation again anyday. Winning breeds interest at BC, it’s always been that way.
Writer at BC Interruption SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
Follow me on Twitter
ive got that problem with duke this year sort of
I’ve got tickets to every game this year, except Duke. Bought most through the Black Friday sale and only paid $120 for all the games this year (season tix are $190). But I can’t get a Duke ticket. When they put the $65 flex plan on sale I already had tickets to all the other games so it didn’t make any sense to buy it. All the tickets I’ve seen online are over $100. I can’t believe people would actually pay that, but the season ticket holders who bought up all those seats to resell them think it’s not worth selling them for less than that and are willing to just eat the tickets if they can’t get what they’re asking.
Not sure if you want to pay this much, but looks like our ticket partner, TiqIQ, has tickets for as low as $79.
Check out the tickets tab at the top of the page.
http://tickets.bcinterruption.com/eagles-tickets
Editor, BC Interruption
by Brian Favat on Jan 13, 2012 11:43 AM EST up reply actions
yeah, I’d pay $30 or $40 but not more than that, considering I’m paying $10 max for every other game this year. im just out of college with an entry level job and can’t really afford to waste more than that on tickets to 1 game. what bothers me is that I’ve been there front row center for every minute of every game this year through the 40 point loss to umass and whatever else, at the games where nobody else cared enough to show up, but for the duke game i can’t get in because all the donors who couldn’t be bothered to come to any of the other games decide to hoard tickets that they sell at 4 times face value
I should be able to get you up to two tickets at face + ticket office fees. I can’t justify buying them for myself, but I’d be willing to be the middleman if I knew they were going to good use.
Some other thoughts
Clifford – I’d like him shooting more than 8 times a game and that includes some mid-range shots (he’s shown good touch from outside the paint). He’s one of our more efficient scorers and needs to be more aggressive.
Heckmann – He needs more than 12 minutes. And he only took that 1 3-pointer? Kinda shocking.
Jackson – Love his attitude and his trigger. Doesn’t seem to force things and his stroke his sweet. Also loved that he put it on the deck and drove the lane for that and 1. But how is he a 44% FT shooter???
Daniels – Knew he was a better shooter than his early season results. If they keep leaving you open, let it fly.
Moton – He gets a lot of flack for not being an ACC player and all, but he definitely helps this team and works hard on defense. He’ll never be a gamechanger on offense but he does have a role on this team.
Anderson – Not his best game, but glad to see the team still pulled this out despite him not having a huge game.
Caudill – Man he has horrible hands. Needs A LOT of work.
Humphrey – Much much better play from him lately and you can see he is making a concentrated effort on defense and on the boards. GREAT to see.
Lonnie Jackson wins the award for more excited following last night’s victory. Loved his energy, though he should have never been on the floor in the final seconds of the game if he’s only a 44 percent FT shooter.
Editor, BC Interruption
by Brian Favat on Jan 13, 2012 10:17 AM EST up reply actions
Can he elect to take FTs from beyond the arc?
Editor, BC Interruption
by Brian Favat on Jan 13, 2012 10:32 AM EST up reply actions
Jordan Daniels is like a buck 25 soaking wet.
Editor, BC Interruption
by Brian Favat on Jan 13, 2012 10:43 AM EST up reply actions
i'm taking a step back from ledge
Good to see the W, and the demeanor and excitement they showed with the win was also heartening
These guys have fight in them, which i think reflects well on the Don.
by cwm2005 on Jan 13, 2012 11:19 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Need to get stronger and tougher inside and keep Caudill on bench
And yes, need more fan support
Does anyone else think
given the development (or lack thereoff) of Caudil that we need to look at brining in another big for next year? We’ve got 2 great guard recruits but no help coming inside. We’re basically operating with 2 Centers and a PF. That’s not exactly a lot of inside depth, especially considering that Caudil, the rest of his game notwithstanding, hasn’t shown that he has the conditioning to remain in the game for more than 3 or 4 minutes at a time without getting winded. I’m not saying we need someone else at Cliff or Anderson’s level, but just another big body that can eat up minutes and help with some of our interior depth issues. Eddie Odio with muscle basically.
Still Recruiting
I think the Don is thinking something similar. He’s going after Ryan Taylor & William Howard who are two tall 3’s that can play a little bit of the 4.
I don’t think we need another center just someone that can spell minutes at the 4 and add some much needed physicality to this team.
Definitely some progress
I’ve watched every game this year and you can definitely see the progress the team is making. Add in our recruits, Hanlan and Rahon (and potentially Taylor) to the nucleus of Clifford, Anderson, Jackson, Heckmann and Daniels and you have something that will be very interesting.
Love the fight and effort. Keep it going guys!

by 












