Luke Kuechly: 2011 Heisman Candidate
[Front Page'd -- Ed.]
Luke Kuechly is a special football player. He’s one of those guys that comes along once a generation, and people don’t truly realize how incredible he is until he's gone. In high school, Luke was a good but not great recruit from Cincinnati, Ohio who was one of BC’s better commitments for the class of 2009. Little did we know how good he would become.
In his true freshman season, Luke quickly grabbed a starting outside linebacker spot and never looked back. He had 158 tackles, second in the entire nation. He had double the tackles of any other player on the team. He led the Eagles in tackles 12 out of their 13 games. He was the Emerald Bowl defensive MVP with 16 tackles ... as a freshman. Luke was first team All-ACC and the ACC defensive rookie of the year. He was incredible, having one of the greatest freshman seasons in BC football history.
Luke was certainly amazing in his first year. But he had the element of surprise. In his sophomore season, teams could play around him; go to weaker points in the defense. So, it would’ve been completely understandable to see Luke’s stats drop. They didn’t. A stronger, older Kuechly moved to middle linebacker where he continued to terrorize rival running backs and receivers alike. He was a tackling machine, amassing 183 throughout the course of the season, easily leading the NCAA. In fact, this was the 3rd most tackles ever made in a season since the NCAA began keeping track. He was the definition of consistency, extending his streak of games with at least 10 tackles to 22. He hit the 20 tackle mark twice, with 20 against NCST and 21 against Duke. He wasn’t only All-ACC but a consensus All-American. And yet, The Boy Wonder was ignored by committees for the Nagurski and Butkus awards due to the fact he was a sophomore.
On top of his incredible football skills, Kuechly is also a well-spoken, intelligent, moral individual. Coming out of high school, Luke had a 3.8 GPA. When choosing a college, it came down to BC, Duke, UVA, and Stanford. You hear athletes claim that academics come first all the time, but Luke shows it, succeeding in the Carroll School of Management while dominating on the gridiron. In fact, he has drawn comparisons to Clark Kent due to his reserved alter ego off the field, as well as his short black hair and glasses. He is committed to BC’s Jesuit values and commands respect from his teammates, getting elected captain as a junior.
Last year, Duke's head coach David Cutcliffe stated, “I think [Luke] is the best defensive football player in college football. Absolutely, without question.” I agree, and with another year of lifting and experience under his belt, we can only imagine how good Kuechly will be this year. Now, it is my personal opinion that if the Heisman trophy is actually given to the most outstanding player, regardless of position or school, than Luke has to be in the mix this year. Now, he probably won’t be, due to the fact that he plays linebacker on a team that won’t likely be a championship contender this year. But imagine for a second that Kuechly manages to get a mere 11 more tackles than last year. That would give him the NCAA record for most tackles ever in a season. Add that to growing media hype and a successful season, and then maybe the unthinkable happens.
15 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The No Votes better be explaining themselves.
by polarbearbrother on Aug 26, 2011 2:20 PM EDT reply actions
voted no
because defensive players rarely win it, especially if they have not lead their team to a big bowl game
by bistroburrito on Aug 28, 2011 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions
I voted no.
Only because defense never win Heisman’s and getting a ton of tackles won’t be enough to get the attention of the Heisman Committee. I love Kuechly and I think he will win the Butkus Award but unless he leads the nation in forced fumbles, defensive touchdowns, LB sacks or one of the other stats that catch people’s attention, I just don’t see it happening.
Writer at BC Interruption SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
Follow me on Twitter
I'm a 'no' vote too
Not because Kuechly isn’t a complete animal, but because I really don’t think he has even the slightest shot at winning the Heisman Trophy. He’d have to do something so amazing and BC would have to have a ridiculously special season for him to even get a NYC invite.
Does Luke have a great chance of winning this year’s Lott IMPACT, Bronko Nagurski, Bednarik, Rotary Lombardi and Butkus Awards? You bet. But the Heisman?
Our best offensive player in the 20+ years A.F. after Flutie (Matty Ice) couldn’t even get an invite to the Downtown Athletic Club and BC went 11-3 that year. If our best offensive player couldn’t get an invite, I’m not holding my breath that arguably one of our best defensive players of all time will get an invite.
The Heisman has devolved into an award that does nothing more than reward the best offensive skill position player on a National Championship team.
Editor, BC Interruption
My signature at Eagle Outsider is Kuechly for Heisman
Brian,
Kuechly will win the Heisman if (and only if) BC goes 13-0 and goes to the National Championship. They don’t have to win it, but they have to play in it for Kuechly to get the votes. Obviously, the Heisman winner will be the MVP on one of the two teams playing for all the marbles in early January. So the only way that Kuechly has a chance, is if BC not only wins the ACC, but goes undefeated into the MNC. Just going 13-0 and to the Orange Bowl (because two other BCS teams went 13-0) means Kuechly can’t win it.
by innocentbystanderbc on Aug 28, 2011 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Also (and sadly), BC going 13-0 doesn’t guarantee a National Championship Game appearance, especially after starting the season unranked. Ask Cincinnati.
BC’s SOS may give them an outside shot at the BCSNCG, but if there are two other power conference undefeateds, you can bet the Eagles will be left at the altar.
Editor, BC Interruption
by Brian Favat on Aug 29, 2011 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Based on the way the question was asked “Is he a Heisman Candidate?” I took it as “should” he be as opposed to "will he be.
by polarbearbrother on Aug 26, 2011 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions
The question was intended to ask “will he be”, but I understand that people could’ve seen it as “should be” as well. There is a large difference between the two, and I’m curious if the those who dont think he will be a candidate also think he should be one,
by jackaramsey on Aug 28, 2011 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd at least like to see him get mentioned as an outside candidate.
FSU Football, making bad teams look bad since 2010.
by onebarrelrum on Aug 27, 2011 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions
What if...
We start counting INT yds as rushing yds and he ends up being our leading scorer?
by DCash on Aug 26, 2011 2:44 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Not yet
It is very difficult to be voted the best as a junior. Next year, definitely.
Probably not wining it
But, if he has another year like last year and sticks around for his senior year then maybe next year it might get more momentum based on what will be obscene career numbers.
by DCash on Aug 26, 2011 6:54 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
what an article
I agree hes a great kid but defense gets no love when it comes to heisman. Great article though. Very well written

by 














