Ranking College Football's Best Coaching Jobs
As our friend f4h over at Gobbler Country would say, this is why we can't have nice things.
Yesterday, SI's Andy Staples ranked the nation's top 20 college football coaching gigs, and to the surprise of few (no one?), the ACC is home to all of zero of Staples' top 10. Naturally, of the top 10 jobs in college football, half of those were in the SEC. Two, including Staples' number 1 gig Texas, were in the Big 12, two in the Big Ten and one in the Pac-12.
The first ACC school to crack the top 20 was Florida State at 14. Staples writes of the Seminoles coaching gig:
"Because of the school's location, FSU's coach has to work a little harder than Florida's coach. Tallahassee is at the northern edge of the state, so players from Central and South Florida have to drive right through Gainesville on the way to FSU's campus. The Seminoles are closer to many players in Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina, but they have to fight to get those players out of their home states. That said, coaches at most schools would volunteer a limb to have as many quality players within 300 miles of campus."
I agree that Florida State's location in Tallahassee presents a bit of a challenge for Jimbo Fisher and the Noles, but c'mon. Beggars can't be choosers, am I right? FSU is still located in one of the sports few high school football hotbeds, and has plenty of history beating up on the rest of the ACC in the pre-expansion days of the conference.
Virginia Tech is the only other ACC program at the list, checking in at 17. Interestingly, Staples knocks the Hokies down a bit due to the program's lack of revenue streams. While Virginia Tech is the only ACC program to consistently sell out its home stadium, Lane Stadium's capacity of 66,233 is good for just the 36th largest stadium in Division I-A, which limits potential football revenue. The fact that the ACC has failed to produce a second BCS at-large team also hurts Tech and the rest of the conference in terms of revenue.
Can't say I have many beefs with Staples top 15 or so, but things seem to really break down for me after that. After Virginia Tech, Staples ranks Arizona State, Arizona and Oklahoma State to round out the Top 20 in what seems to me to be a case of clutching at BCS conference program straws.
I don't understand the Arizona State and Arizona picks at all. Sure the Pac-12's new sweetheart media rights deal will help fill the coffers of both school's athletic budgets, but both programs play in small-ish stadiums (Arizona State 71,706 and Arizona ... 56,000!) and have very little history of success. The Wildcats, in particular, have just one Pac-10 title to their name and an all-time bowl record of 6-10-1. I get the Oklahoma State pick, but one incredibly wealthy booster does not an awesome coaching job make.
Notably absent from Staples' top 20 list, at least to me: UCLA and Miami.
Despite their recent struggles, UCLA still has plenty of history, plays in a stadium that ranks nationally in the top 10 in terms of capacity (the Rose Bowl seats 92,542) and will benefit just as much as Arizona State and Arizona will from the Pac-12's TV deal. Despite playing in the shadows of their cross-town rivals for the better part of a decade, UCLA still has to be considered one of the best jobs in college football.
As for Miami, just because Shannon wasn't the guy to lead the U back to the glory days doesn't mean that Miami isn't one of the best 20 head coaching jobs in the sport. Miami benefits from an insanely beneficial geographic location and from loads of history from the days when the 'Canes dominated the Big East. The only thing missing is an on-campus stadium and the fans. Can't speak about the prospect of Miami getting an on-campus facility any time soon but surely the fans will return if Golden can return Miami to its winning ways.
I would also consider ranking the Texas A&M and/or Wisconsin jobs over Arizona State, Arizona and Oklahoma State.
In all, Staples ranks six SEC programs, four Big Ten, four Pac-12, three Big 12, two ACC and Notre Dame. Haha, Big East.
In terms of the ACC, I have no qualms with Staples ranking Florida State and Virginia Tech 1-2, though I would probably rank Miami ahead of Virginia Tech. Either way, it's close between those two programs for second. After Tech/Miami, I'd probably rank Clemson, then Georgia Tech, then N.C. State, in that order.
I'd probably give Boston College the seventh best coaching gig in the conference, with a slight nod over Maryland, who is and probably always will be a basketball-first school. BC has a proud football tradition as a Northern program that will push you around in the trenches and play solid defense.
The knock, obviously, is a small stadium, small-ish fan base and plays in a market that ranks D1 college football somewhere between the New England Revolution and the MLL's Boston Cannons in the Boston-area sports pecking order. Despite its faults though, I think we can confidently say we are a football-first school -- hold back your sailing jokes! -- which is more than I can say about the bottom four ...
Rounding out my bottom four would be North Carolina, Virginia, Wake Forest and Duke, who clearly care more about basketball, Olympic / non-rev sports, basketball and basketball than football, respectively.
What do you think? Agree with Staples' list? What are some of the best college football coaching jobs in the country? How would you rank the coaching jobs in the ACC? Ready? Go.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Let's get this ball rolling....
ACC Order
1. FSU
2. VT
3. Clemson
4. Georgia Tech
5. Miami
6. NC State
7. Maryland
8. BC
9. Wake Forest
10. UNC (Only because of the impending sanctions, otherwise I would put them at #6)
11. UVA
And a not even close last place… Duke
Contributor at BC Interruption
Founder of Mass Hysteria Sports
Miami is also missing money, other facilities, and a supportive administration. And they must face the big two in state.
In my lifetime UCF and probably even USF will pass them. Way more resources.
'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)
Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
There’s no way UCF can possibly pass Miami if they stay a non-AQ program. The revenue disparity is too great to overcome.
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
No way. UCF rapes its students with all sorts of fees and has an enrollment of 55,000. Miami has an ugad enrollment of 10,120
'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)
Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
Miami gets 12x what UCF gets in TV revenue alone, not to mention the BCS bowl payout disparity. Non-AQs will not be able to compete with AQs in terms of revenue generation. The gap is only getting (much) wider between the haves and have nots.
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
so..you HOPE ucf and usf will pass the U. laughable. let’s talk about these resources. the most important resource there is in college football is recruiting. and the U so happens to inhabit prime, beach-front recruiting real estate. whether they’ve taken advantage of that as of late is debatable. the only thing usf and ucf is going to do is dilute the recruiting pool for “THE BIG TWO” in the state of fla. so keep dreaming bud. go eat your grits.
I’m a soccer nut, but I can’t believe the Revs get more pub than BC…though on boston.com the Revs logo is featured next the the Pats, Bruins, Sox and C’s. Whereas BC is lumped into “Colleges”. I suspect that’s more Kraft flexing his muscle than real interest, though the soccer fan in me would love to be wrong.
I’ve often wondered what BC could do better/differently to make it more relevant to Boston, in a way that GT, Miami, and USC are. I think the formula is just win baby. All those other programs are small-ish like we are, but each has won a national title. What’s it gonna take for us to set that as the goal? Think big Fr. Leahy!
Now’s the time to really step up and go for a BCS title. If a college playoff ever develops, I think our chances go down significantly. Wouldn’t it be easier for BC to go undefeated in the ACC and then have a one-off game against, say, Oklahoma, than it would to go 6-2 in conference and then have to play West Virginia, Ohio State and then Oklahoma to win the championship?
by chicagofire1871 on Jun 4, 2011 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions
A lot of things would have to break BC's way to play for a BCS National Championship
I mean a lot.
Look at Cincinnati in 2009. Go undefeated during the regular season, playing in a BCS conference and the partying gift is your head coach bolts for Notre Dame and you get pasted in the Sugar Bowl.
If there were two other BCS conference undefeateds left standing, BC would certainly be the program left out due to the poor public perception of ACC football and not being ranked high enough (if at all) in the polls at the beginning of the season.
Personally, I’d rather take our chances with a four- or eight-team playoff.
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
I really don’t think a school like Georgia Tech enjoys much more local support than we get. Atlanta is an SEC city where University of Georgia fans dominate and they care much more about the Falcons, Braves and Hawks then they do about Tech.
My guess is the Jackets fall somewhere between the Winnipeg Jets and the WNBA Atlanta Dream in the ATL sports pecking order.
The rooting model for a small-ish private school is completely different from a large, public state school. Just because you live or grew up in Massachusetts doesn’t ensure you’ll root for Boston College like it does if you grow up in Texas, Alabama, even Cal, etc.
BC isn’t embraced by the Boston area because we haven’t won enough and we still have this stigma as a private, exclusive rich kid school.
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
It’s hard to rank these linearly, so how about put them in buckets of 1st tier, 2nd tier, 3rd tier?
1st tier: (Any other ACC coach would take these jobs)
1. FSU
2. Clemson
3. Miami
4. VTech
2nd Tier (You’d have to sell it, but you can have success in building your resume here)
5. GT
6. NC State
7. BC
8. Maryland
Tier 3 (If you’re a MAC or C-USA coach, these would be the BCS schools to go for)
9. UNC (hardest one to place, but coming sanctions landed it here)
10. UVA
11. Wake Forest
12. Duke

by 













