Boston College Athletics And The Mirage Of Innocence
Over the past two months, college football misconduct has been dominating the news. I don't need to rehash all the stories as you've heard them a thousand times by now. Ohio State, Oregon, USC, and now North Carolina have put the darker side of the NCAA in the public spotlight with a laundry list of violations. Every day I wake up, I say a little prayer to God and thank him that BC hasn't been caught doing anything illegal because violations and sanctions would be devastating to the program.
But is BC really an innocent program? According to Darren Everson of the Wall Street Journal, that would be a qualified yes:
"There are only four athletic programs from major conferences on the list. They are Boston College, Northwestern, Penn State and Stanford."
Now when I said BC should be considered innocent on a technicality, I mean they wouldn't be on that list if point shaving counted as an NCAA violation. (If you haven't heard about this scandal, I recommend picking up Henry Hill's autobiography Wise Guys). Point shaving would also knock out Northwestern as well. That would leave only two schools from major conferences without a major NCAA violation. One of those programs is Stanford (not terribly surprising), while the other still has the same football coach as they did when Lyndon B. Johnson was President.
How has Boston College escaped the NCAA's cobra clutch?
BC has the advantage of being a private school, meaning that they can be sneakier with accounting, don't have to share information with the public and can easily hide their indiscretions from the NCAA and reporters. Another advantage is that we live in a pro sports town. The local media doesn't give a crap about BC athletics as they are too busy fawning over last night's Red Sox game or Tom Brady's latest haircut. In almost all of these recent cases it's the media that begins the investigation and conducts most of the brunt work for the NCAA. If the media isn't interested in the school, they tend to forget they even exist.
That being said, it's not hard to see why BC doesn't fall into the same traps that some of the other schools do. Having a clean history and having teams that don't attract attention has helped keep investigators off campus. And honestly the administration doesn't put the same pressure on their football and basketball programs to win than a school like Ohio State or Florida State does. If Boston College Athletics expected an ACC crown and a top recruiting class year in and year out, either we would either hear about these violations or there would be a new coach every season.
Does this mean that shady things don't happen in Chestnut Hill? Of course not. These sort of things probably happen just like any other school. But what should worry you the most, is that if these infractions are occurring, the NCAA isn't aware of them and that isn't good. Schools that self-report to the NCAA usually are met with softer punishments than those that try to sweep their mess under the rug. Let's just hope that if BC commits a violation in the future they notify the NCAA, because an uninformed NCAA is a bitch you don't want to mess with.
21 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Does this mean that shady things don't happen in Chestnut Hill?
I’m sure BC has had their fair share of minor transgressions over the years, but I doubt some of the stuff that has gone on at UNC, Tennessee, USC happens at BC. It’s pretty much out of control in those places.
The “if you ain’t cheating, you ain’t trying” mentality is everywhere in college sports these days. I’m glad BC has done a better job than most in keeping clean, but the question now becomes how do we translate excellent compliance into competitive advantage.
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
Great quote from N'western's AD
“I don’t want to come across as holier than thou,” said Northwestern athletic director Jim Phillips. “We’re proud of what we’ve been able to do, but with 500 18- to 22-year-olds, anything could happen at any time.”
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
That is a stunningly pessimistic view. BC tries harder than most to play it straight and respect academics and the schools Jesuit mission.
We don’t have a better track record because we hide it better or because we don’t get investigated because we haven’t been caught. We have a better track record because we are in fact one of the cleanest programs in the country. Not perfect, but legitimately and seriously focused on the school’s overall mission and strong culture.
Agreed
The question becomes how do we capitalize on this? GDF should be pressing the flesh to get stricter compliance in general.
The more even the playing field, the better positioned BC will be for long-term success.
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
Nothing says “men and women for others” like racking up $13,185 in parking tickets!
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
by Brian Favat on Jun 24, 2011 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions
Point
CSOM,
I wasn’t trying to say that BC is running a crooked program, or that they are as bad as the big time offenders. I was just trying to explain that it’s unrealistic to think that BC is running a completely clean program, and the term “innocent” is inappropriate.
Contributor at BC Interruption
Founder of Mass Hysteria Sports
Innocent until proven guilty?
There have to be at least few other schools out there with the advantages you listed for BC (private, not media darlings) that still get caught for violations.
Agreed.
Definitely innocent until proven guilty.
When I think about it though, the number of smallish private, city schools that don’t get a lot of press are very few in number. The only schools I can come up with are TCU, Tulane, BC and Northwestern. Three of the four are home to some of the biggest point-shaving scandals in NCAA history. The fourth was in the old SWC, where every conference member subscribed to the “if you ain’t cheating, you ain’t trying” theme.
While I believe that BC does a better job than most at institutional control and compliance, I do think some of these “advantages” have helped BC historically. I also think that the school’s long-time football independence has helped, as BC didn’t get sucked into the group-think / rat race mentality that comes with competing in a major CFB conference.
Timing and winning also have something to do with this. With success comes greater scrutiny. Look at Butch Davis down at UNC, who turned an ACC doormat into a pretty solid football program.
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
by Brian Favat on Jun 24, 2011 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions
One thing I would like to see
is a list of the violations for the schools. Not to see the USCs and Oregons, but to see “What did Duke or Notre Dame do?”
Notre Dame was sanctioned by the NCAA for general douchiness.
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
by Brian Favat on Jun 24, 2011 12:39 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Yes
And for the abusing the Yukon football program by forcing them to sign a 10-year series without one true home game…
I thought that deal was off?
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
by Brian Favat on Jun 24, 2011 12:42 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It was?
You very well could be right and I just missed that.
Duke's Goes Way Back
The example on Duke I found was from 1971, and involved David Thompson…You can read more about it here.
Contributor at BC Interruption
Founder of Mass Hysteria Sports
Thanks
Appreciate that.
A list of every BCS school and any major violations would be an interesting procrastinating tool.
Great writeup here
Over at Cowboys Ride For Free, they are counting down the dirtiest programs in college history. Here’s the top 5.
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
Seeing as how small, private schools that the local media doesn’t care about, seem to be able to get a pass on this, it’s all the more impressive that PSU and to a lesser extent Stanford have been able to have the success they’ve had without getting caught for anything. When are we getting PSU back on the schedule?
by chicagofire1871 on Jun 24, 2011 12:16 PM EDT reply actions
Stanford? Success? The Cardinal has had 2 great seasons in football in the last 30 years.
And I get the sense that people in the Bay Area just don’t really care about Stanford football. Pressure to win just isn’t there.
BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog
by Brian Favat on Jun 24, 2011 12:37 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
That’s correct. I live in San Jose now and no one really cares except when Cal plays Stanford. But that does reinforce the importance of having a legitimate local rival. If Cal and Stanford didn’t have each other, both would be significantly less popular.
by chicagofire1871 on Jun 24, 2011 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions
The Bay Area has two pro football teams
They don’t really care about the college or high school games. Even most Stanford grads don’t care except for one game a year.
Around Evanston
All honest Wildcats fans live by the rule, if we are really good at something, we must be bending the rules,,,Can’t wait until Labor Day
Dikaia Upotheke - Justice Our Foundation















