Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why Hockey Fans Should Root For Devils Vs. Kings

NCAA Tournament Snubs: Does Boston College Have A Legit Gripe?

Joe Trapani #12 of the Boston College Eagles fights for the ball against Nikita Mescheriakov #25 of the Wake Forest Demon Deacons during the second half of the game in the first round of the 2011 ACC men's basketball tournament at the Greensboro Coliseum on March 10, 2011 in Greensboro, North Carolina.  (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)

Brian: Selection Sunday has come and gone and BC didn't hear its named called as one of the teams in the Field of 68. But neither did Colorado, Alabama, Virginia Tech or St. Mary's. The question is which snubbed program has the biggest gripe of being left out of the field of 68? How would you rank the NCAA Tournament's list of snubbees this year?

Jeff: I think certainly Colorado was the biggest snub this year. After that I'd say BC. I know I'm biased and most others would go with Virginia Tech but BC beat Virginia Tech twice this season. Some people might say Alabama, but I personally think the SEC was very weak this year and Georgia should not have gotten in and Florida should have been a 4 or 5 seed instead of a 2 seed. Actually if you look at Colorado, they lost to both Georgia and Harvard out of conference who were other bubble teams this season. We also know what flaws BC has this season.

I guess the bottom line is that the bubble is not what is was last year. Last year, with three less teams in the tournament, Clemson and two other teams would be on the outside looking in instead of BC, Colorado and Alabama. As the tournament expands, bubble teams have bigger and bigger flaws on their resume and it's tough for anyone who did not get an at-large bid to make a good argument that they should have been in.

As I told you earlier yesterday, I really did think that Boston College was going to get in. I couldn't make a real strong argument that between BC, Clemson and Virginia Tech any one or two of those teams stood about the rest. Also, the committee always seems to favor a conference or two and I thought the ACC would get some love this year for what they've done in the past. I am glad that Virginia Tech is with BC in the NIT because I think the committee got it right that they should've both been in or both been out, but of course I hoped for both in. The committee instead hit the ACC hard with Florida State as a 10 seed and Clemson in a play-in game. Meanwhile, the Selection Committee have the SEC a lot of love seeding Georgia as a 10 and Florida as a 2.

BC should be happy with their season and making the NIT as a 1 seed. Going into the season if we had known that BC would be part of the Selection Sunday festivities even as a bubble team, we would've taken that. Now let's try to win the NIT.

Poll
Which NCAA Tournament hopeful program got this year's biggest snub from the Selection Committee?
Alabama
15 votes
Boston College
75 votes
Colorado
126 votes
St. Mary's
17 votes
Virginia Tech
49 votes

282 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

At mcneese st is ridiculous

I hope bob Ryan catches wind of the nit scheduling and let’s loose in the Globe.

to paraphrase AI: hockey Practice!? Practice. We talkin’ about practice, man. Practice!!

The seniors and fans deserved to host this game. I hope BC wins and conte can at least get game 2

by cwm2005 on Mar 14, 2011 10:11 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I think a graduate of BC was on the selection comitte

I heard rumors about this, but it has yet to be proven. I heard he pointed out that VT lost to BC right after they beat Duke. But he forgot one thing: TO PUT US IN! Oh well, lets look at this NIT tourney as an oppourtunity to prove to the comitee they were wrong by not putting us in.

by DetroitLionKing on Mar 14, 2011 7:47 PM EDT reply actions  

did anyone read Shaughnessy's piece on si.com

about how harvard was the biggest snub. He did make some good points, but like all his articles he only provides everything good that a boston team did without noticing anything good the teams outside this city do and then concludes that the boston team got the short end of the stick.
However, anyone who reads Shaughnessy knows what they’re getting from the start, but for a man who is so blatantly biased towards boston sports why is it that he NEVER writes anything good about BC?

by bloomsday16 on Mar 14, 2011 7:51 PM EDT reply actions  

I know exactly what youre feeling

I’m originally from Detroit, I dont live in Boston anymore but when I did I read his stuff and it irritated the hell out of me that he never gave credit to BC. But he’s always kissing BU, Harvard, the Red Sox, and the Pats’ ass. I just dont get it. Maybe he’s a BU graduate, thats why he hates BC.

by DetroitLionKing on Mar 14, 2011 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think he's holy cross

which would explain that he feels some animosity towards bc i guess

by bloomsday16 on Mar 14, 2011 8:13 PM EDT reply actions  

His son played baseball for BC, but I thought I remembered hearing something about him having a falling out with the program?

http://bceagles.cstv.com/sports/m-basebl/mtt/shaughnessy_sam00.html

BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog

by Brian Favat on Mar 14, 2011 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BC Interruption, a blog dedicated to Boston College athletics. Get BCI updates via Twitter.

Managers

Bci_reasonably_small_small Brian Favat

Bci-lg_small Jeff Martyn

Editors

Cavslogo_small Conrad Kaczmarek

Thumb A.J Black

A_small Grant Salzano