Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Predictions

Over / Under: 2011 Boston College Football Schedule

One of the big ticket news items on Monday was the release of the 2011 BC football schedule. The schedule features just six home games, including a Thursday night contest between the Eagles and Seminoles, and six road trips -- Orlando, Clemson, Blacksburg, College Park, South Bend and Miami Gardens. Let's analyze next year's schedule with a game of Over / Under.

 

Over / Under - 3.5 wins in the month of September

Jeff: I have to go over here. Northwestern is a good team but the game is in Chestnut Hill so that gives the Eagles the edge. After that, anything less than 3-0 in the next three would be a disaster. UCF is literally maybe half the team they were last year and have no business beating a decent ACC in 2011 regardless of where the game is played. Then we get Duke at home and a I-AA school. Need I say more?

Brian: I am going to go under here. I think it's 3-1 to start the season, with the most likely culprit being an opening game loss to Northwestern. And no, I'm not saying this because I want my other alma mater to beat BC. I think that Northwestern is a program headed in the right direction under Pat Fitzgerald, and with QB Dan Persa back, I think the 'Cats have a pretty good chance of knocking off a BC squad that will be proving out a new offensive system and rebuilding the offensive line.

The other factor that I think could lead to an opening season loss is the fact that classes won't have started for BC's first game. A lot of students and families will likely use the weekend to help students move in, and my guess is this game won't be heavily attended by Superfans. That's not to say the game won't be well attended by alumni and other fans, but I think this will detract from any sort of home-field advantage that BC will have in this one. I could be wrong about the attendance, and could be wrong about losing to Northwestern, but I still think 3-1 is a safe bet. Under.

 

Over / Under - 1.5 wins in the month of October

Brian: I will go slightly over here and say the Eagles go 2-2 in the month of October. Wake Forest will be better next year, but the Deacons have to travel to Chestnut Hill and that game is about as sure of a win as the Eagles have on the 2011 schedule. After the Wake game, the schedule takes a pretty turn for the worse. Three straight road games -- Clemson, an open date, Virginia Tech and then Maryland. I can't remember another time where the Eagles have had three straight road ACC games on the schedule, and winning on the road in conference is no easy task.

Like last year, the Eagles benefit from having the week off before preparing to play the Hokies. Hopefully they use the week to improve and, you know, score some points against Virginia Tech. BC could easily go 0-3 in these three road games, but I think they will get a win in at least one of these games. BC beat Clemson this year and played Maryland close. The Terps have a lot of talent, but will likely be going through some growing pains under first year coach Randy Edsall. The Hokies will look very different in 2011, too, but I'm not ready to predict that BC can somehow knock off Virginia Tech. Especially not with the way the programs has struggled against Tech the last two years. So let's say 2-2, with wins over Wake Forest and Maryland.

Jeff: Absolutely over here. 2-2 in the month of October wouldn't really be an accomplishment either. Beating Wake Forest at home is as close to a lock as we have on our ACC schedule, then we only need to get one win out of three away games. We went 1-2 against Clemson, VT and Maryland last year but it is entirely possible that all three teams are worse next year than they were this year while the Eagles should be as good or hopefully improve.

Star-divide

Over / Under - 1.5 wins in the month of November

Jeff: Fortunately, I predict us to be bowl eligible going into November with a 6-2 record. Depending on who the losses come against and if we can we some games in dominating fashion maybe even ranked? November has the potential to be bad. N.C. State is a big question mark in my mind but all those questions will be answered by the time we play them. N.C. State is really the only team we have a chance of being favored against in November. We've been ranked higher than Florida State before and been underdogs at home so I would imagine we will be underdogs in 2011 and then we will certainly be underdogs in our road games. However, with all that said, I am going over. My early early prediction for 2011 is 8-4 in the regular season and since I have us 6-2 going into November, I'm going over.

Brian: I'll also go over here. Between the Florida State and N.C. State games, I think there is a win in one of those two games. As you said, N.C. State is a big question mark next season, but Spaz gets up for that game like no other. BC also always plays Florida State close at home. I also think that Miami will struggle more than people think in Al Golden's first season. The 'Canes have a ton of talent, but next season is as good a chance as any for the Eagles to win their first game at Miami since Flutie-to-Phelan. I don't think 2-2 is an unreasonable expectation, though I wouldn't be surprised if we go just 1-3. For now, though, I'll go over.  

 

Over / Under - A third place finish in the ACC Atlantic Division

Brian: BC will finish higher than Wake Forest, but I'm struggling to come up with other teams that the Eagles will surpass in the standings. Florida State has to be considered the favorite to repeat in the Division, especially with the same favorable Coastal Division matchup that Maryland got this past year -- Duke, Virginia and Miami. The 'Noles benefit from not facing the defending ACC champs, Paul Johnson's triple option offense or Butch Davis and the Tar Heels. Clemson has a much tougher road, avoiding the same Coastal teams that FSU plays and road trips at Virginia Tech, Maryland, Georgia Tech and N.C. State. Like this year, the Tigers could once again finish middle-of-the-pack in the Division this season. Maryland won't have as easy a time navigating next year's schedule, finishing on the road for its final three games. Still, the sched isn't all that difficult, and if the Terps get past Miami in the Thursday night opener, they could start the season 3-0 in conference before road trippin' to Tallahassee and hosting the Eagles. N.C. State is the real wild card in the Division, and the program with the most favorable schedule of the six. The Pack miss both Miami and Virginia Tech, and could easily start the season 7-0 before playing at Florida State.

Overall, third place sounds about right to me. But because pushing isn't manly, I'm going to go under here. Way too early 2011 ACC Atlantic Division standings: 1) Florida State, 2) N.C. State, 3) Maryland, 4) Boston College, 5) Clemson, 6) Wake Forest.

Jeff: I too have us finishing ahead of Clemson and Wake. I also have us finishing ahead of Maryland though. I am simply not going to predict BC finishes behind Maryland until Maryland shows some serious improvement. BC had Maryland beat last year despite only showing up for half the game. If our players believed in themselves a little more and had experienced an ACC win prior to that game, BC would have beaten the Terps for sure. So I guess I'm pushing.

 

Last one, Over / Under - 2.5 wins on the road

Jeff: UCF, Clemson, Maryland. That's three. OVER!!!!! You can't rule out the possibility of winning at Notre Dame or at Miami. Actually, you can't even rule out winning at Virginia Tech. No ACC road games are locks but with six road games this season, I certainly see getting three wins.

Brian: Agreed, over. Only slightly. BC will be fortunate to win three of six on the road next season. BC gets the bye week before the game against Virginia Tech, which will help. I would have liked to have seen the Hurricanes on the schedule earlier in the year, but I think the Miami road game is also winnable. In terms of difficulty, I'd say, from easiest to hardest, 1) Central Florida 2) Maryland 3) Clemson 4) Miami 5) Virginia Tech 6) Notre Dame.

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think a tie for 4th with MD (Wake last) is very doable.

'11: Minimum Goal: 9-3 Regular Season. Given FSU's non-con slate, don't care who the 9 are.
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 8th in offense, 88th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on Feb 16, 2011 12:08 PM EST reply actions  

I think we start out 5-0 so I’m over on the first one.

I also think BC ends up 8-4 (5-3), so that would likely put is in a tie for 2nd.

by 31southst on Feb 16, 2011 2:14 PM EST reply actions  

Wake Up the Echoes

Here’s the “yellow flag”. Unless, BC brings some emotion every week, then forget the season. With Tranquil, they would have been 0-6 on the road. Chase Rettig did not improve the entire year according to Doug Flutie. Billie Flutie spent the entire year “carrying jock straps” and holding for extra points. There is no emotion. Spaziani had it in “spades” when he was an assistant. Where did it go? Dan Persa of Northwestern has both “heart and soul”. His last game was a victory when he threw a touchdown pass with a torn achilles which then ended his season. Dan Persa is great and that’s where Chase Rettig needs to be as well as Christian Suntrup who is coming in from St. Louis. Kevin Rogers is the key. There has to be a fire in the locker room. The “drowning of the seniors from last year” sent a definite message to the younger players. There is no loyalty at the top and it’s a business. “Stratego” does not win football games. “Fire in the ‘whole’” does! Ooh-rah.

by JBQ on Feb 16, 2011 5:46 PM EST reply actions  

Flutie is wrong about chase

And that is the only time I will ever mention flutie and wrong in the same sentence again. Chase never “exploded” for a huge game as the season went on, but the system he was in never really looked for him to. I think he did become more comfortable with his role within the offense as the season went on (that role was handing it to montel and passing to receivers who were not open or able to catch the ball as they were just as inexperienced). Yea, in our bowl game he didn’t look very good, but its clearly unfair to blame the ineptitude of the offense in that game solely on him. I don’t by any means think Chase is going to be explosive next year, but I expect him to be increasingly more effective in supporting montel and our run game and offering a more balanced attack.

As soon as we can do anything in the red-zone besides give it to freese for 3 the ooh-rah thats been missing from this offense since ryan left will come back, and i really think that is the only thing that will bring the intensity back… players need to see some type of success in order to build confidence

by bloomsday16 on Feb 16, 2011 10:58 PM EST up reply actions  

SOUNDS ABOUT RIGHT

8-4.

Chase didn’t cost us too many games, INTs. He doesnt need to be a superstar but just be a game manager. I think he can fit that role. As long as harris and williams can run for 150+ a game, we will be in every game. Our defense should be stellar once again, so i see us improving from last year.

by BCRaj on Feb 17, 2011 1:03 PM EST reply actions  

agree

however, this schedule is tougher, both our out of conference games and the way the acc games play out too, my first inclination is to go with 8-4 too, but I actually think to go 7-5 again would be an improvement on last season (if only as far as “moral” victories go).

by bloomsday16 on Feb 17, 2011 8:21 PM EST reply actions  

Re: Classes not starting

Classes hadn’t started for our home openers the past two seasons, but both games were by far our best attended games of each season for the students (especially at the opening kickoff). However, most students were gone before the games ended cause they were both well in hand. They usually don’t allow any move-in during the football game to force the students to move-in on the days before it so they can go. Considering our home opener opponents were Northeastern and Weber State the past two seasons, I think even more students would be inclined to move-in early and get there early for a game against a solid and likely bowl-bound BCS school that has the potential to be on national television.

by bcfan131 on Feb 18, 2011 12:41 AM EST reply actions  

First game attendance

Maybe they were well attended from student perspective, but attendance was poor overall, which definitely detracts from the atmosphere:

2010 Weber State – 34,168 (even with Herzlich’s return)
2010 Kent State – 35,122
2009 Northeastern – 33,262
2009 Kent State – 25,165

Attendance is definitely a concern with the AD this year, especially with only six home games and the one game against a marquee game (FSU) happening on a Thursday night.

Also, while Northwestern is a BCS program on the rise, I don’t think casual fans / alumni have taken notice. N’western has been so bad historically that unless you very closely follow college football, I don’t think this game is going to be a huge draw.

BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog

by Brian Favat on Feb 18, 2011 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BC Interruption, a blog dedicated to Boston College athletics. Get BCI updates via Twitter.

Managers

Bci_reasonably_small_small Brian Favat

Bci-lg_small Jeff Martyn

Editors

Cavslogo_small Conrad Kaczmarek

Thumb A.J Black

A_small Grant Salzano