Conference Realignment: DeFilippo Speaks Out On Latest Round Of ACC Expansion
Interesting comments in today's Boston Globe from Boston College AD Gene DeFilippo, who has now publicly stated the school opposed UConn's inclusion in the ACC during the latest round of conference musical chairs.
"We didn't want them in. It was a matter of turf. We wanted to be the New England team.''
This seems to confirm what we have been saying for over two weeks now, that any block of UConn by Boston College had everything to do with BC wanting exclusive conference rights over New England, and little to do with hurt feelings or past litigation. This was consistent with:
-- South Florida's desire to keep Central Florida out of the Big East
-- The Texas Longhorns reportedly needing to be convinced to let TCU join the Big 12
-- The supposed "gentlemen's agreement" between Florida, Georgia and South Carolina to keep Florida State, Georgia Tech and Clemson, respectively, out of the SEC.
-- The University of Kentucky being "not cool" with Louisville joining the SEC.
And when Texas was ultimately convinced to support TCU's inclusion in the Big 12, there wasn't the same history, perceived vitriolic comments directed at BC and the bad blood stemming from the 2003 lawsuit. And so the Frogs are headed to the Big 12 while Connecticut faces an uncertain future in the Big East.
As for the inclusion of Pittsburgh, who joined the state of Connecticut and UConn in the lawsuit against BC, this appears to be nothing more than a shrewd business move on behalf of GDF and Boston College:
"Turning to Pittsburgh BC officials argued that Pittsburgh, with a stronger tradition in football, as well as a long-established - though dormant - rivalry with the Eagles, would be a better fit.
[snip]
Duke and North Carolina, who have thrived as rivals and neighbors, didn't quite understand the passion behind BC's argument, but Pittsburgh seemed like a reasonable alternative. Under Jamie Dixon, Pittsburgh had established itself as a national power in men's basketball, so the Tobacco Road contingent didn't argue. Calls were made and invitations were accepted."
If nothing else, this speaks to the growing influence that Boston College has on the rest of the ACC. Certainly not as a major player on the field of play (at least this past year), but one that knows a thing or two about sound business decisions and negotiations tactics.
Now if only we could take these sound CSOM business principles and apply them to our current football program, we'd be all set.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm a Maryland fan
and after some aggressive day drink, I’ve decided that as a founding member of the ACC I’d like to trade BC to the Big East for UConn. To sweeten the Pot. The ACC will further agree to stop stealing NON-football playing schools of the Big East.
Don’t worry, it’s like trading a middle reliever for the end of a season, you’ll come back at the end of the year and bring along your friend Notre Dame.
I like Turtles!
Follow @RedTerrapin
by RedTurtle on Oct 9, 2011 2:23 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Wish we could trade Maryland for Vanderbilt…
by Eagle in Brighton on Oct 10, 2011 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Maryland and Wake Forest for Vanderbilt and Kentucky.
Editor, BC Interruption
by Brian Favat on Oct 10, 2011 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
Maryland is like Dave Kingman
If we’re doing baseball analogies, isn’t Maryland like Dave Kingman? Everyone always felt should have been great, but never really was and remembered primarily for striking out a lot. Plus he was pretty nasty, a la those UA unis.
by Lothar17 on Oct 9, 2011 7:46 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I've read this article a few times now ...
Things that don’t see above board:
Few, if any, direct quotes or sources from anyone other than GDF. It seems like maybe someone told Blauds in confidence that all this stuff went down but the story isn’t corroborated by anyone else.
“According to sources in the Big East and ACC, the idea is to reestablish the ACC as the preeminent conference in college basketball and was a predatory strike at the Big East, which, while struggling to improve its BCS rankings in football, had established itself as the runaway leader in basketball.”
Really, who? Notice how he leads with “According to sources in the Big East.”
In this instance, it was the voices of Duke Hall of Fame basketball coach Mike Krzyzewski and athletic director Kevin White that rang the loudest.
So what did Coach K and Kevin White have to say on the matter? No attributable quotes to either.
Editor, BC Interruption
Agreed
It’s a poorly constructed/sourced article.
by Eagle in Brighton on Oct 9, 2011 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Sound business principles?
I understand the desire to be the only New England team, but this seems like it would help football in the Northeast and create a strong, multi-sport regional conference rival (sorry BU). Having UConn in the ACC sounds like it could become a license to print money…
Because BC-UConn is the next Duke-Carolina, right?
Editor, BC Interruption
by Brian Favat on Oct 10, 2011 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m just saying it seems hypocritical to complain about the lack of support for college football in the Northeast and then complain about the possibility of having one of the few other schools in the Northeast with a legitimate football program into the conference.
Obviously a BC-UConn rivalry wont match Duke-UNC, but I don’t think GDF’s making a good decision in attempting to maintain BC’s “only ACC contender in New England” status. Playing the Huskies in both football and basketball can only strengthen our schedule.
Bingo!
Playing the Huskies in both football and basketball can only strengthen our schedule.
Benefits UConn, not BC. BC will soon have three non-conference slots a season. After Notre Dame, a MAC school or a service academy and the I-AA opponent, there’s no room left on the schedule. BC doesn’t need UConn. UConn needs Boston College.
Editor, BC Interruption
Okay, I’ll say that’s a sound argument for football, but what about basketball. What’s the downside to having a home and home with UConn every year?
What incentive is there for UConn, whose fans love to tout its 23-game winning streak over BC hoops back in the 1990s or whatever.
Is there some shortage of local New England Division I-A hoops programs to schedule?
Further, it was UConn’s HC, not BC, who made comments about never scheduling BC in hoops again. I’m surprised Calhoun wants to rush back into playing BC annually.
Editor, BC Interruption
What’s the downside to having a home and home with UConn every year?
That doesn’t require UConn switching conferences.
by Eagle in Brighton on Oct 10, 2011 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Neither of those is really a downside for BC though: the first is a reason why it’s strange that UConn would want to play BC and the latter is just an observation. It still doesn’t mean that UConn becoming an ACC basketball school is detrimental to BC, does it?
I’m not trying to pick at you guys, I’m on board with your explanation for why it’s not good for football but you haven’t sold me on it being bad for basketball.
I didn’t really give you a reason, true. Just pointing out that it’s UConn agents that have refused to play BC in hoops. Not BC.
BC still plays Providence, UMass, Rhode Island, Harvard, Holy Cross, etc in basketball. And BC and UConn still play one another in virtually every other sport to this day.
Editor, BC Interruption

by 















