Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bob Sapp Denies Throwing Fights

Five Good Minutes: Clemson Football Preview With Shakin The Southland

Photo

To preview this weekend's game between the Eagles and Tigers, we welcome back the crew from Shakin The Southland for Five Good Minutes. In exchange, I answered some questions about the Eagles over at STS. Yeah, about that whole "I think Montel Harris will play and be fine" thing ...

 

BC Interruption: First year OC Chad Morris came to campus highly regarded, but did Clemson fans think that the turnaround on offense would be this great so fast. Evaluate the Clemson offense through five games.

Shakin The Southland: I don't think any reasonable fan thought the offense would go from one of the worst AQ offenses to one of the best. The offense is explosive and fun to watch. Sammy Watkins, Andre Ellington, Nuk Hopkins, and Dwayne Allen are all big time playmakers and Chad Morris' offense does a great job of getting the ball into their hands and letting them make plays. As great as the offense is to watch, Morris has been a revelation for the program. He is a tough, hard-nosed coach who calls it how he sees it. He doesn't sugarcoat his thoughts to spare feelings. I think the players are reacting well to this new style of coaching and the results show that.

There is room for improvement, however. Our offensive line has done a decent job pass blocking, but they've really struggled to open up holes in the running game. Morris' offense is a spread offense with a power running game. In order to execute the power running game the offensive line needs to open holes through the A-gaps. This has been a problem and it reflects in Andre Ellington's rushing statistics. If the o-line can flip a switch and start moving people off the ball in the run game, this offense could take its game to another level.

 

BCI: How about on the defensive side of the ball? How have the Tigers improved on defense? Who are some names to look out for on Saturday?

STS: The defense started slowly the first four games of the season before turning in a great effort against VT in Blacksburg. The first four games were marred by big plays. Troy, Wofford, Auburn, and FSU all had explosive plays resulting in scores. The secondary wasn't tackling well, they were taking bad angles, and they were struggling to stay with receivers down the field. Against VT, the secondary played off the receivers a little more, letting VT's receivers catch the ball underneath short of the first down marker and then did a good job wrapping up and making tackles. It also helped that VT's offense seemed content on being conservative and not taking shots down the field.

DE Andre Branch had a huge game against VT with 11 tackles and 3 sacks. The defensive line for Clemson has played pretty well as a group this year. The d-line is led by DT Brandon Thompson, who has been outstanding to this point. He is unblockable with one guy and draws a consistent double team game in and game out. That leaves a lot of one on one opportunities for undersized DT Rennie Moore. A lot of people questioned his size prior to the year, but he's stepped up in a big way and erased doubts that others may have had. He uses good leverage and his quickness to beat the opposition and make plays down the line.

The linebackers have struggled a bit. WLB Tig Willard has come on strong the last two games, so there is hope. I also expect to see more of the 5-star freshmen Stephone Anthony and Tony Steward in the coming weeks. Anthony has been very good when on the field and if he can keep his head in the playbook enough to read the formations and adjust the fronts, I expect him to overtake Corico Hawkins at MLB. He's that good.

 

BCI: With the big turnaround on offense, is Dabo still the man to lead this team going forward, or is he getting a bit assist from Morris and the offense? What is the fan base's opinion of Swinney as HC at this point.

STS: Some fans love Dabo for his energy and enthusiasm, while others were tired of his goofy antics and his fluff-filled press conferences where he continued Tommy Bowden's 'one play away' motto. I write for Shakin' the Southland, so you can guess which side I fall on. I do think winning has been a great recipe for silencing his critics. There isn't too much to complain about right now. The guy is a great recruiter and has surrounded himself with a great staff. Is he the best X's and O's coach in college football? Hell no. Does he make boneheaded decisions like trying a fake field goal while up 8 points midway through the fourth quarter (Wofford game)? Unfortunately, yes. His game management skills still need refinement. But if he continues to stay out of Chad Morris' way on offense and keeps pulling in top 10 recruiting classes, I think the coaching staff around him is good enough to carry him through his game management growing pains.

 

BCI: 5-0 Clemson has just two more upcoming opponents ranked in the top 25 -- at #13 Georgia Tech and at #18 South Carolina. What is one game you have marked on your calendar as a potential trap game.

STS: UNC comes to Death Valley two weeks after our game with BC. I think that contest is going to be very tough. UNC has great athletes. Donte Paige-Moss and Quinton Coples will give our offensive tackles one heckuva time. I'm definitely not overlooking that game.

But an even more under the radar game is the road trip to NC State. NC State isn't very good right now (maybe that's an understatement). But if they get some guys healthy along the defensive front and Mike Glennon gets more polished as the season goes on, that's a potential trap game. It has a couple of the quintessential characteristics for a trap game: a road contest the week before a big rivalry game. If the players are looking ahead to South Carolina, this game could be a stumbling block.

Star-divide

BCI: Eagles fans can't like their chances on Saturday as BC comes into the game as more than a 3 TD underdog. What would have to go wrong for Clemson for the Eagles to have a shot in this one?

STS: I think Clemson 'Pulling a Clemson' is one possibility. 'Pulling a Clemson', as many know, means beating a good team and getting some positive attention from the media, only to follow it up with a stinker. Now we are getting close to throwing that notion out the window this year after 3 straight solid performances with the national spotlight on. The other scenario is turnovers. Clemson hasn't turned the ball over nearly as much as I expected and I feel like they are due for a game where the ball just isn't bouncing their way. I anticipated that happening in Blacksburg last week with the poor weather conditions, but it didn't happen. If BC doesn't create turnovers, I think Clemson's offense is able to move the ball up and down the field and put some points on the board.

 

BCI: Last one. Prediction time. Who ya got? What's the final score?

STS: I'm taking Clemson, but I'm hesitant to take Clemson by too wide a margin just because of their history with BC. That being said, I think Boyd plays well. Morris has preached to Boyd that he wants to end every possession with a kick (extra point, field goal, or punt). So far he has done a good job of that and has kept the turnovers down. I believe if that continues Saturday, Clemson has too much firepower on offense for BC to keep up. I'll go 35-17 Clemson....or if I were a betting man I'd take BC and the 21 points.

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Shakin' My Johnson blog is super low class .. always will be

I wish BCI would not talk to these arrogant, low class punks from the Shakin’ My Johnson site.

Here is the message I get when I go to the Shakin’ My Johnson site:

You are banned from Shakin The Southland.
You can browse the blog, but you can’t participate.

Fuck off loser.

by waterwater on Oct 6, 2011 10:00 AM EDT reply actions  

You are a caustic commenter. This surprises me none at all.

by AdamBC on Oct 6, 2011 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Milquetoast

Thank you Adam. I will try to not ruffle any feathers and be a good boy from here on in — PROMISE.

Glad to see you find STS so upstanding and that you are able to share your dull and lifeless version of BC with the slime at STS. I am sure they appreciaite your pessimism and your comments make them respect BC all the more. NOT.

And, as for me, your comment surpises “me none at all” (what kind of phony grammar is that ? is that pseudo English Don grammar ?))

Yes, Adam it is not surprising to find a guy like you on a BC board. Having graduated from BC, I know your type: Mr. Milquetoast. Heck, I bet you were part of the crowd that used to delight in Mod “dress up” parties. Am i right?

by waterwater on Oct 6, 2011 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well there you go Water. This sort of post is exactly why you are banned from STSL. If you want to go there and talk football, express your opinion respectfully, and back up that opion with reason, then you won’t have a problem. You opened up this thread with a vulgar comment. This was pointed out to you. You respond by insulting that person multiple times as well (and this is a site supporting your school). Most people use these sites to read about other opiniions on their football teams and perhaps share their own. Your posts above add absolutely nothing to the conversation at hand. If I administered this site, I’d ban you from here as well.

by hopefultiger on Oct 6, 2011 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

ok, mr. Tiger

I see you made a grand total of 28 posts in 2 years. How on earth do you know why i was supposedly banned? Answer: you have no idea whatsoever.

There is no disagreeing with the clowns who run STS and their “liberal use of the banhammer.” It is a group of good ’ol boy types who fear outsiders, particularly Yankees. If you disagree with them and supply evidence, you are absoutely banned. STS is a club for yes men and lackies.

In fact, quite a few Clemson fans have commented on this site that Shakin’ My Johnson is a low class site and is NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF CLEMSON.

We see many fine Clemson fans at BC every other year. Nice folks,

But the arrogance and pompous nature of Dr B and Figure4 is just insufferable. If you enjoy reading about recruiting stars and Clemson’s supposedly superior athletes, and how bad Dabo is, how bad the school president is, wjhy Clemson should jump ship from the ACC to the SEC, or — and I love this one best — the proper us by Clemson fan of Car magnets and Car Flags.. Ha! then enjoy it.

But if you are a BC fan, go there and disagree with these clowns and see what happens. STS is the blog that is contrary to American values, such as dissent and free speech, as well as contrary to notions of good sportmanship and should be banned.

and really, does my use of the word “Johnson” really offend you so much Mr Prissy Tiger. Is that really ’vulgar" on a sports blog.

And the term “Fuck off Loser” was written by STS, not me. what is your view about such ‘vulgar’ words??

by waterwater on Oct 6, 2011 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh please

water^2, you have proven my point. Your vehemence is wasted. Rather than put your rage issues to use in stumping for how great BC and the fans are, you would rather take the low road, relying on ad hominem attacks of people who both cheer for and against BC teams.

You are the worst type of BC fan, the one that people distance themselves from, the one that people say “he’s not with us” as you are a terrible ambassador for the premier Jesuit football program in the country.

Perhaps back in the day your attitudes were warranted – I remember the fans that Big East teams would bring to Conte and Alumni and you had to be prepared to respond in kind. However, in the ACC I hold myself and other BC fans to a classier standard.

by AdamBC on Oct 6, 2011 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

you sound like total dick, Adam

spare me your absolutely stupid lecture.

by waterwater on Oct 6, 2011 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not a dick, I’m just better than you. /s

by AdamBC on Oct 6, 2011 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Why you were banned.

I’ll guarantee you that you were banned for breaking one of the rules that you agreed to when joining the site. My guess is that it was for making a personal attack on another poster or one of the bloggers, since you’ve made at least 2 personal attacks in this thread alone.

by PenthouseTiger on Oct 6, 2011 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

You guarantee -- oh really!

another TigerNation jackass offering baselss speculation.

I was banned for rooting for BC in the land of Orange. Simple as that. Clowns will do what Clowns Do and Shakin’ My Johnson is the land of clowns.

by waterwater on Oct 7, 2011 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think we have another vote for my

Trade BC for UConn Band Wagon

#AggresiveDayDrinking

I like Turtles!

by RedTurtle on Oct 9, 2011 10:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Trade Maryland for West Virginia. /real football school

by Brian Favat on Oct 12, 2011 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

All WW posts should come with a disclaimer: “Does not represent BC, nor the BC fanbase at large…”

by Eagle in Brighton on Oct 10, 2011 10:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BC Interruption, a blog dedicated to Boston College athletics. Get BCI updates via Twitter.

Managers

Bci_reasonably_small_small Brian Favat

Bci-lg_small Jeff Martyn

Editors

Cavslogo_small Conrad Kaczmarek

Thumb A.J Black

A_small Grant Salzano