Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bob Sapp Denies Throwing Fights

Lawsuit Filed by Former BC Star Charlie Davies

Edit. Front Pag'd.

The soccer equivalent of trying to lob the keeper from 60 yards out.

This is not the usual BC story, this is something you'd expect from say, UConn. We have all made poor judgements in the past, some of them alcohol played a major part in, but for the most part the consequences were at worst a walk of shame or repeated trips to Lower for some Powerade. This was not the case for Charlie Davies who on October 12, 2009, broke curfew for the US Men's National Team for a night out.....but it didn't stop there. He attended a private event at a DC Area night club, and then got into a car with a person who was intoxicated.  From there we are all aware of the tragic events that took place. 

Charlie Davies has had a difficult road back, and the BC community can take great pride in seeing Davies playing in the MLS, after suffering such horrific injuries.  Let's not forget that everyone loves a comeback story, and we shouldn't downplay the hard work and determination that Davies put in to get back to this point.  Full disclosure, I'm a big Charlie Davies fan, and although my national ties are to England, I'd have been happy to purchase a Davies' US National Shirt.   While comebacks are great, there were some poor decisions he made to get to this place.  1. Breaking Curfew 2. Going to a club during training/international matches 3. Getting into a car with an intoxicated driver.

This isn't an advertisement deterring drunk driving, but we all have heard horror stories about what can happen. Here is a perfect example of drinking and driving and the "it can happen to anyone", even to superstar athletes.  Fast forward 2 years, Charlie Davies just filed a $ 20 M lawsuit against the DC Area club and Red Bull who was sponsoring the bar event, on the basis of overserving a visibly intoxicated person, who happened to be his driver.  Now I won't try to be BCI's Roger Cossack, but let's be honest, how much you consume is on you, no matter what the District's act says. Yes there were damages, but causation is where the line gets blurry.  A quick law lesson, anyone can sue anyone, but that doesn't mean a court will hear the case. 

This lawsuit is the fourth mistake in a chain of events that can't be undone.  Is this a statement Charlie is trying to make against bars and overserving? A quick conversation with the great mambino, also brought up this question, is this Charlie Davies' backup plan, realizing soccer won't take him very far- time to try playing the lottery?

Charlie Davies, your decisions led to your situation, don't try to pawn it off on other people.  Learn from your mistake and let it be.  Let people remember you for learning from your mistake, owning it, and then making the best of a bad situation.    

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Don't Let the Actual Law or the Facts get in the Way of a Good Rant or Why We have Trials & Juries

Contributory negligence and assumption of the risk are not a defense to negligent service of alcohol in violation of Section 25- 121. Jarrett v. Woodward Bros., Inc., 751 A.2d 972 (D.C. App. 2000).

 Davies’s attorney, Jon Pels:

"We believe the facts will show, among other things, that Mr. Davies had no interaction with the driver at the Shadow Room and was in a separate room. Without getting into detail, as he was leaving, the driver asked if she and her friend could give him a ride to his hotel. In the hustle and bustle of the lobby as he was walking out — a split-second decision — he said yes. There was no meaningful time in which Mr. Davies had an opportunity to ‘observe’ the driver; he had no knowledge what she had been drinking or whether she had been drinking. This is to be contrasted with what we believe was an ‘open bar’ in a separate room with what the bar (and others) were able to witness over a protracted period. We believe that it should have never gotten to that point and the defendants should not have continued to serve her alcohol and permitted her to drive."

by Leonard E Sienko Jr on Oct 19, 2011 9:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Women drivers

He probably thought he would hook up with her and her friends.

by Garrett_TD23 on Oct 31, 2011 7:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BC Interruption, a blog dedicated to Boston College athletics. Get BCI updates via Twitter.

Managers

Bci_reasonably_small_small Brian Favat

Bci-lg_small Jeff Martyn

Editors

Cavslogo_small Conrad Kaczmarek

Thumb A.J Black

A_small Grant Salzano