Conference Realignment: Clemson (Again) Denies Interest In Move To SEC
It appears that Mark Blaudschun's fantasy Big East implosion scenario that sent Clemson to the SEC and Connecticut to the ACC as the Tigers' replacement made its way all the way down to Clemson, South Carolina on Friday. If Clemson has had conversations with the SEC recently, that is news to Clemson president James Baker, The Post and Courier reports.
"We have not had any contact at all from the SEC whether it be through first, second or third parties," Barker said Thursday morning. "We are part of the ACC and that is how we are planning our future."
[snip]
Barker said Clemson is committed to the ACC, the same message he delivered the last time Clemson was linked to the SEC in August. Barker indicated the ACC's recent additions of Syracuse and Pittsburgh, have stabilized the conference.
"I think that's been a positive thing for our conference," Barker said."
So I suppose we can put that report to bed, eh Mark? Please circle back with Susan Herbst and the Courant editorial staff since you'll now have to conjure up another false rumor of an ACC school looking to switch conferences so the Huskies can backdoor their way into the conference. Here, I'll go ahead and start you off.
"Word is spreading through the Big Ten that Maryland may come into play as team No. 13, along with Notre Dame, which has had a change of heart and is now more than happy to trade in its football independence to become an all-sports member of the conference. The Terrapins are more of a Big Ten fit than ACC fit in many ways, even though they are a founding member of the conference. Ways that I will not address in this report.
[snip]
"If that happens, the ACC will be forced to go for a 14th team. The first choice would be Notre Dame, but since the Irish appear headed to the Big Ten than [sic] UConn comes into the picture."
You're welcome.
HT @doncorboni
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
good one
you even right the guys’ stuff with the sick in
While I'd love to see Maryland in the Big Ten for academics and research alone...
…any scenario where it goes in as #13 with Notre Dame at #14 is ludicrous. Unless Delany and Big Ten presidents suddenly decided to go for broke on the eastern seaboard with a Maryland/Rutgers combo (a move that could be argued, but it still a longshot), Maryland only gets in as #14, a complement to Notre Dame (which likely isn’t happening anytime soon).
Even Blaudschun would know that.
Blauds still thinks Boston is a Big East city. He doesn’t know sh-t.
Editor, BC Interruption
by Brian Favat on Oct 15, 2011 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
The trick with Blauds / pro-UConn camp is it has to be a rumor you’ve heard before. Then when he says it 3 months later, it seems remotely possible even though it’s based on nothing.
Editor, BC Interruption
by Brian Favat on Oct 15, 2011 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Maryland fan here
ACC for life, I can’t stand Big 10 BBall.
I like Turtles!
Follow @RedTerrapin
Sorry, but the Big Ten trumps the ACC in everything else
You have to look at the big picture. I’m happy with the expansion of the ACC, but if Maryland ever gets an opportunity to join the Big Ten, it has to go.
Sweeping generalization much?
ACC a better conference for a number of Olympic sports.
Editor, BC Interruption
Fair enough...
I suppose I was focusing on football and research. The ACC is certainly better in soccer, baseball, lacrosse and probably women’s basketball.
This may be news to some ACC people, but Syracuse doesn’t even have a baseball team, never mind a hockey team. Never understood why, especially since the have a dome.
Syracuse does this to get around Title IX, among other things.
Unclear whether ACC rules require all-sports members to play baseball. I know BC’s move to the conference came with a promise of upgrading our baseball facilities.
Editor, BC Interruption

by 











