Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Isn't Up To Speed On Jeremy Lin, 'Linning'

Big Ten Expansion to 16 Teams? Ripple Effects

From last Friday's Columbus Dispatch:

Reports say that the Big Ten, currently with 11 schools, is considering adding three or even five teams. Either plan would allow the conference to stage a football championship game, as the Big 12, Southeastern and Atlantic Coast conferences already do. And with teams as geographically diverse as Rutgers and Texas being mentioned for inclusion, expansion could radically alter the college sports landscape.

First, let me say that I just don't see radical Big Ten alignment - to the tune of 3 or 5 teams - happening any time soon. I remain unconvinced that a conference that has flirted with possible expansion three separate times and failed to pull the trigger would suddenly commit to something as radical as adding 3 or even 5 teams. Of course, 3 or 5 team Big Ten expansion would surely create a ripple effect that would be felt throughout college athletics.

Also, a 5 team Big Ten expansion must assuredly means the death of the Big East as a football conference. Something that West Virginia coach Bill Stewart has publicly stated is only a matter of time. The rest of college football would have to rally around the flaming wreckage of the once proud Big East football conference and pick up the pieces.

Let's assume for a moment that the Big Ten does go as radical as 5 team expansion, with a majority of those teams coming from the Big East.

A "Big Sixteen" might consist of:

East: Syracuse, Rutgers, Pittsburgh, Penn State, Michigan, Michigan State, Purdue, Indiana
West: Ohio State, Minnesota, Illinois, Northwestern, Iowa, Wisconsin, Missouri, West Virginia

I've taken liberties including West Virginia here, as they haven't been publicly mentioned as a possible Big Ten target (presumably because of academics). I've also left Notre Dame out because I don't think they will reconsider their independent positioning, despite Swarbrick's recent statements on the matter.

This new super division creates two problems. For one, you've effectively killed the Big East as a football conference, stealing away arguably their four best football programs (at least historically). Two, you've taken away a critical 12th team from the Big 12 and they would have to scramble to replace Missouri.

First, on salvaging the Big East, you are left with Cincinnati, South Florida, UConn and Louisville. After courts threw out UConn's lawsuit against Jim Delaney for "conspiring to weaken the Big East," the Huskies along with C-USA bolt-ons Cincy, South Florida and Louisville would be looking for new homes. The problem is, with the Big Ten superconference now formed, the math regarding the number of teams in other conferences tends to break down.

I doubt the ACC or the SEC would be willing to take on these four new programs on a whim, without the exploratory research that the Big Ten, Pac 10 and MWC are now conducting on conference expansion possibilities. That leaves these four programs to find homes in either the MAC (although already at 13 teams, I can't imagine the scheduling headaches of a 17 team conference) or back to Conference USA for Cincinnati, South Florida and Louisville.

An expanded 16 team Conference USA might look something like this:

C-USA East: East Carolina, UCF, UAB, Marshall, Cincinnati, South Florida, Louisville, UConn
C-USA West: Houston, Southern Methodist, Tulsa, UTEP, Rice, Tulane, Southern Miss, Memphis

Adding the four former Big East teams to the East division and moving Southern Miss and Memphis to the conference's West division.

The other problem of replacing Missouri in the Big 12 hasn't been solved yet either. Most discussion around the Big 12's reaction to Big Ten expansion centers on wooing away Arkansas from the SEC to be reunited with their old Big 8 buddies. The addition of Arkansas also likely changes up the makeup of the Big 12 divisions, allowing the conference to shift Oklahoma to the north so they can finally get their Texas-Oklahoma Big 12 championships.

Big 12 South: Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Baylor, Arkansas, Oklahoma State
Big 12 North: Oklahoma, Nebraska, Kansas, Kansas State, Iowa State, Colorado

Finally, to replace the hole that Arkansas leaves in the SEC, the SEC would likely go after either Clemson or Florida State from the ACC. My gut tells me neither South Carolina nor Florida would be particularly happy about this move, given that they would be introducing an in-state rival into their conference (and the knock-on effect this would have on recruiting), but I would imagine the SEC would listen to UF's pleas before they considered South Carolina's argument against expansion. So my guess is Clemson would bolt for the SEC, setting up an SEC that looks like this:

SEC East: Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Vanderbilt, South Carolina, Clemson
SEC West: Mississippi, Mississippi State, Alabama, Auburn, LSU, Tennessee

With Tennessee moving from the SEC East to the SEC West to accommodate Clemson.

Finally, the ACC would be left to fill the void left by Clemson, and this could take any number of directions. The ACC might look at one of the teams from the former Big East. South Florida for its geographic fit. UConn to give BC a northern dancing partner. Or even Louisville in some strange hope that this would give the ACC a footprint in a traditionally SEC market. 

Another option would be Navy, who have acquitted themselves well, at least in football over the past few years and would be a natural rival to Maryland. For sake of argument, let's go with Louisville. This also gives the ACC an opportunity to realign their divisions to something that, well, makes sense:

ACC North: Boston College, Maryland, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Louisville, N.C. State
ACC South: North Carolina, Duke, Wake Forest, Georgia Tech, Florida State, Miami

There would be a slot left in the newly expanded Conference USA, which seems like a perfect opportunity for one of the odd-numbered MAC teams to move to Conference USA. Let's say Ohio moves over, renewing their rivalry with Marshall in C-USA's East division. That evens up the MAC at 12 teams and Conference USA at 16 teams. 

So basically, if the Big Ten doesn't carefully weigh their options and recklessly expands to 16 teams, the ripple effect may be felt from Storrs, Connecticut to Boulder, Colorado. You could have the UConn Huskies stuck playing football in Conference USA (heh), Louisville playing in the ACC, Arkansas in the Big 12 and Clemson in the SEC.

Crazy, I know. But so is the thought that the Big Ten will expand by 5 into the country's first 16-team super conference. 

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good job

But isn’t the Pac-10 expanding too? lol

by Jiftastic on Mar 16, 2010 3:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Pac-10 expansion opens up a whole other can of worms, but I think the ripple effect will only directly effect the Big 12, WAC and/or Mountain West.

The only way I can see Pac-10 expansion affected the ACC other than described above is if they decide to expand to 12 or 16 and leave the Big 12 with 10 or less teams where they need to backfill with 2 teams. That might have a domino effect for the SEC, and then the ACC.

BC Interruption, a Boston College sports blog

by Brian Favat on Mar 16, 2010 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

MWC

If the MWC loses Utah and TCU would BYU go independent?

by Jiftastic on Mar 16, 2010 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have to catch up on my reading, but I briefly saw a SBN blog post about what would happen if college football went to super conferences and how that might cause a bunch of programs to go back to being independent. Would be interesting.

BC Interruption, a Boston College sports blog

by Brian Favat on Mar 26, 2010 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh wait..

Hah i didn’t see “From last Friday’s Columbus Dispatch”

by Jiftastic on Mar 16, 2010 3:32 PM EDT reply actions  

This would completely ruin college sports!!

You see, you spend a good piece of your life gripping a baseball, and in the end it turns out that it was the other way around all the time.

~Jim Bouton, Ball Four, 1970

by br0nxb0mbers23 on Mar 28, 2010 4:22 PM EDT reply actions  

The only way college football super conferences wouldn’t ruin the sport is if the teams that didn’t end up in these conferences all go independent.

BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog

by Brian Favat on Mar 28, 2010 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

This would basically

Create a Division 1-A 1-AA & 1-AAA, am I right?

by Jiftastic on Mar 31, 2010 6:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Could do, but not necessarily.

BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog

by Brian Favat on Mar 31, 2010 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

in the 70's they tried to make a super conference

link

If the Ramblin' Reck burns the nationwide average of 1.61 gallons/day, it produces 14 kg of CO2 equivalent per day. 14 kg/day is less greenhouse gas emissions than those produced by a single cow or horse. There is a proverbial herd of mascots in I-A football that is more polluting than the Ramblin' Reck...

by BirdGT on Apr 3, 2010 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

BCS could rule..

The BCS could step up to the plate here and agree that all six conferences are to have 12 teams and a playoff game. Doing so would buoy their PR and provide fans with consistency. You are right – the Big Ten expanding larger than twelve disrupts the balance everywhere. The Big East is sitting back waiting to be taken. Kind of pathetic.

by Tony77019 on Apr 1, 2010 7:49 PM EDT reply actions  

That’s probably a good idea, but I don’t think the BCS can force this since the conferences span well beyond just football.

BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog

by Brian Favat on Apr 1, 2010 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is it possible

To just be in a conference for football that you aren’t in other sports?

by Jiftastic on Apr 6, 2010 3:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Temple and the MAC.

BC Interruption, SBN's Boston College Eagles blog

by Brian Favat on Apr 6, 2010 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BC Interruption, a blog dedicated to Boston College athletics. Get BCI updates via Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Boston-college-stadiums-full-court-view-of-conte-forum-bc-s-x-00011md_small
Boston College Basketball: Should Deirunas Visockas Play More?
Small
Schedule guesses?
Small
Latest Team Sport Records
Small
Patriot Super Bowl Run Only Pushes BC Athletics Further Into The Abyss
Small
Question For BC Fans
Small
Boston College Football Recruiting Pitch
Small
Latest Pucks Bracketology
Small
THE LAST DAYS OF SPAZOO ARE NEAR!
Small
Akeel Lynch, More On ...
Small
NBA Eagles: Dudley, Smith and Jackson

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Bc-eagles_small Brian Favat

Bci-lg_small Jeff Martyn

Editors

Bc-pin_small A.J Black

Contributors

Cavslogo_small Conrad Kaczmarek

A_small Grant Salzano