Headlines: Boston College defeats #21 Clemson 75-69
Brian: The Eagles proved that their latest two game ACC road trip wasn’t a fluke as they jumped all over the #21 Clemson Tigers in the first half to build up a 42-25 halftime lead. BC would ultimately hold on to win 75-69. Reggie Jackson provided a spark off the bench, pacing the Eagles with 18 points and hitting some clutch free throws down the stretch. What did you like from the Eagles performance tonight?
Jeff: Beating the Clemson press is certainly the first thing that comes to mind when thinking about the Eagles' performance last night. Beating teams that press is always such an issue for BC. I also liked the balanced scoring. Reggie Jackson, Corey Raji and Rakim Sanders all scored double digits. Joe Trapani had nine, seven players had at least two FGs and everyone who played scored. It is rare that nine players score in an ACC game without ever getting to garbage time.
Brian: During the game, you mentioned that the fact that Tigers junior guard Demontez Stitt was not playing could not be overstated. So, in your opinion, if Clemson had Stitt, would BC still have won?
Jeff: Yes, probably. Not yes definitely. I think the Eagles played well enough to still beat a healthy Clemson team last night. However, the game never would've gotten to the point where Boston College was up close to 20 points had Stitt played and we probably would've trailed at times during the second half. You never know for sure but BC fans know as well as any that you don't realize how valuable players like Louis Hinnant are until they're gone and I am certain that Demontez Stitt is as good or a better college player than Hinnant was.
Brian: The BC victory drew the attention of New York Times writer Pete Thamel. Thamel interviewed Reggie Jackson before the game, who remains confident that this team can make some noise in the ACC and push for an NCAA Tournament berth. Jackson mentioned that in the shootaround 15 minutes before tip-off, Conte Forum was empty.
Jackson said that Tuesday night, when B.C. came out to shoot about 15 minutes before tip-off, Conte Forum was empty.
"It was tough coming out in the beginning and not seeing any fans," he said.
Has this team now given fans a reason to show up in full force on Saturday against Florida State?
Jeff: I do feel bad for the team that not more fans show up to Conte Forum on a regular basis, but if the fans have ever had an excuse, this is the year after the team lost to 5 mid-major conference teams before getting into the meat of ACC play. Sure, you and I know that Northern Iowa only has 2 losses this season and that Rhode Island is a pretty good team, but we're still supposed to beat those teams and the Saint Joseph's, Harvard, and Maine losses are even less explainable.
The next three home games against Florida State, Duke and North Carolina are all sold out. Hopefully the fans will be given reason to show up for the Virginia Tech and Virginia games after that.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
Crowd
Sometimes I feel bad for the team that no one shows but if they don’t care (Maine, Harvard, St. Joes) why should we? I’ll go to the games of course, but it’s the marginal fans that aren’t showing.
by claver2010 on Jan 27, 2010 11:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Classic "Chicken or Egg" situation
Does the team play uninspired because no one shows up to BC’s non-conference home games? Or does no one show up to the non-conference games because the team plays uninspired?
by Brian @ BCI on Jan 27, 2010 11:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This is not a chicken or egg situation
How many high school or intramural games did the students (who are the fans not showing) mail in because of the name on the opponents jersey or because of a small crowd? Probably none or not many. One fluke loss is understandable. Not several when an NCAA tournament berth is ultimately at stake.
by Jeff @ BCI on Jan 27, 2010 11:58 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree.
What do past intramural game attendance have to do with BC basketball attendance? Attending a BC basketball game doesn’t involve a student/fan actually playing basketball (as with intramurals). Rather college basketball is a form of entertainment. If the BC fan doesn’t enjoy the experience of going to the game – whether it be because the team stinks, the opponent stinks, student seating sucks, the game starts at 9pm, or they have to study – there are plenty of other forms of entertainment out there to take up their time. Team performance is not the sole reason for poor attendance, and the team can certainly feed off an empty Conte Forum crowd.
Also, it’s not just the students who are to blame here. And this isn’t just a BC issue.
by Brian @ BCI on Jan 28, 2010 8:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
For non-conference home attendance issues, see also: 2009-2010 Miami Hurricanes
Miami had no problem rattling off 8 straight wins at home against directional Southern School U in front of a 3/4 empty crowd at the BankUnited Center.
by Brian @ BCI on Jan 27, 2010 11:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
3rd String
Basketball is 3rd in command amongst students interest and attendance and by judging attendance of whalepants it is 3rd amongst them as well.
Thus they need to generate interest around the program and thus early season losses to schools that have no business playing with them is going to kill them.
We aren’t Villanova, Duke, or some other school where we are a one trick pony.
by claver2010 on Jan 28, 2010 12:07 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Crowds
BC has never had good turnouts for games against teams like maine, uri, or harvard. there is no excuse for losing those games. take a look back from 2004-2007. They beat teams like that and they were never soldout. this team lacks motivation and the reasoning is becuase there is no leadership. after the clemson win you will start to see more faces show.
by bkiklis on Jan 28, 2010 5:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 










